allso bredrin to support di idea dat deh is no copycatness in di bible, but contrary to dat is di fact dat most of di stories tell of a people going northward from africa to di land of egypt, where biblical fact began..look at yuh artical further down...

"In yet another version of ancient Meru history, this one more academically-inspired than the myth, it has been convincingly argued by Alfred M. M'Imanyara, if not beyond doubt, that the Meru came originally from the ancient Nilotic empire of Meroe (circa 300BC - AD100), which is sometimes referred to as an island, as it was bounded by both the White and Blue Niles, and swamps in the south. The linguistic similarity between the words 'Meru' and 'Meroe' is certainly tempting, as is other linguistic evidence, which - although far from conclusive - does suggest at least that the Meru were at some point in contact with civilisations from further north."

dat di meru were at some point in contack wid civilizations from further north...north like egypt..north to whe all Istory began..an people began dem copycating I greatest story ever told, which is di oldest story ever told, an di most truthfull story ever told..yes I..blessings
in His love, an wid Raspeck
kaya I