The animals or man? One version says the animals the other says man?

Or is it just easier to not deal with this question(since you didn't deal with it as THE glaring contradiction the first go round.)

Or is it possible that "God" toldinspired one scribe one thing and the other another. Or was it written down by one scribe and he just made a human error and screwed up the order ion the 2nd telling....which means there are probably a lot more human errors in the Helio Biblio?

Either way you look at it...you come up with the same answer.

Literalism is silly and actually is not what was intended.

But of course you can choose not to deal with this reality. Which I've noticed is your forte.