YOU SAID, "YES CORRECT, BUT YOU CAN VALIDATE THE EMPEROR AS A REAL AND HISTORICAL FIGURE WITHOUT GOING TO ANY BOOK, BE IT HOLY OR NOT GET MY POINT THE SAID , PEACE. "

Well why have faith in things such as the bible, which cannot be proven as fact?

The Emperor HIMself said that he was a mortal man and will be replaced by oncoming generations. How does InI explain what he said?

This is supposed fact, while what he said to Jamaicans in '66 is supposed hearsay...(depending on who you talk to)

So are we to now rely on facts only? If so, the foundation of religion would crumble to the ground.

Bless

I WAS NOT SAYING TO RELY ON FACTS ONLY, I WAS SAYING, I COULD ARGUE THAT BUDDHA AND KRISHNA WERE NOT REAL, BUT THEIR IS'NT A LIVING AND KNOWING HUMAN BEING, THAT CAN ARGUE THAT THE EMPEROR WAS'NT REAL.

LIKE ILL SAY TO THOSE WHO CLAIM THESE SEERS, I DON'T KNOW IF THOSE PEOPLE WERE REAL, BUT I KNOW THE EMPEROR WAS REAL THAT'S MY POINT WHETHER THE EMPEROR SAID HE WOULD BE REPLACED BY THE ONCOMING GENERATION, OR NOT.

THAT SAID GIVE THANKS
FOR SUCH A QUICK RESPONSE.

SALAM NA FIKIR DESTA::

KES AA ADOFO.