|
I know that the vast majority of Indians are a lot darker than me. Forgive me for being a bit pedantic here (which I am about everything), but there are SOME North Indians who are lighter than some Europeans. Some years ago I compared arm colour with an Indian friend of mine when I had a sun tan. My arm was darker than hers. Yes, South Europeans can be considered white, but many Arabs, Turks and Iranians also consider themselves to be white.
White people (and all other "races") are indeed the "mutant offspring" of Black people. If you admit that then you are in effect admitting that we are one species (which is obvious anyway since different "races" can produce fertile offspring). Non-Africans are indeed a kind of "mutant" African. I don't see the evidence for innate mental differences between "races". An African brought up by Europeans will act "European", and a European brought up by Africans will act "African".
Black Africans may well have created the first "high" cultures. I've got no reason to dispute that. But whites are not descended from neanderthals. How can we be when we are (by your own admission) the offspring of Black people? There is nobody alive today with neanderthal genes. The neanderthals died out because they couldn't compete for food with modern humans who were the more successful hunters.
You're right about one thing though, which you alluded to in your previous post. Sexual jealousy (whether founded or unfounded) probably does contribute to white racism, especially among some white males, but they'll never admit it!
You wrote:[ Your Divineness, ]
* Thanks.
You wrote: [ I never said I was non-white. Nor did I say that South Europeans are non-white. ]
* I hear you…but I had to say it!
You wrote: [ I just meant that when I've got a suntan there are Indians who are lighter than me. When I haven't got a suntan I look like any other "white".]
* I don't believe you "look" anything Indian, but rather you want…believe…feel…tanned you could look it.
You are a mutant melanin deficient offspring of black people, that is, you are a "white person" with Nordic facial features. Here’s the deal. The amount of "tan" you can have is too small to make any significant difference in your physical appearance. It’s way too small for you to be considered "Indian" ! C'mon!!!
You wrote:[ I'm not here to infiltrate and infuriate, ]
* Well I was thinking....
You wrote:[ but I've obviously had the latter effect on you. ]
*…IMO, you have nothing else to offer.
You wrote: [ What is a "high" culture? ]
Melaninated people were the first species in the entire world to spring up HIGH Civilizations! I mean, if you read, you will see that Melaninated people were the most famously and successful explorers of the entire world. We traded and lived off the continent in every part of the world and peace was the order of the day! In fact, it was US Africans leaving the continent that produced so many beautiful Cultures in the world............
True peaceful civilizations adhering to balanced society, what I like to call "Matriarchal" societies, whereas male and female delegation of duties/roles were balanced within the community. We created mommoth pyramids..science that has never been able to be explained..how or where our ancient ancestors obtained the advanced technical knowledge to construct these edifices, whereas your Neanderthals ancestors the "white people" were hunter-gatherers in the Caucus mountain!
It’s indeed a matter of pride... our connection from our Melanin rich pineal to Melanin rich universe is definitely the key that connects US "black people" to nature and to Life itself! Melanin has always been a way to strengthen our species and ensure our next ascension! Therefore Melanin has since time beginning always been a threat to white society. You have tried for years to create it artificially in you (tanning, pop pills, have plastic surgery etc.) but we "black people" are the chosen Ones! Therefore, your hate, lies, and indignation. If not what it is?
B.K
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site may at times contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml |