|
I don't get your beef. My reasoning (attempt) was to gain/develop overstandings on the connections and affirmations of what is.
All i know is all of a sudden, you just found the liberty to digress and filibuster on 2 technicalities, absolute zero and vacuums, of which you are incorrect about.
What gives?
Are you possessed by robafreeka AND rsadavidsimmonds.
I was relaying my thoughts on something and you hook into something that hardly has anything to do with my premise.
If this is some kind of tit-for-tat would you please save it for a lighter topic. I take this post and others very seriously...I am in school...I am in church...I am amongst forces that I am trying to be guided by and strengthen my God given provisions. Do you really think that you contributed to the topic? Do you really think that you helped I?
If you are going to (try to) correct someone, could you at least have back-up. (references/proof)
All reasonings are not cars on a toll-road, each one does not have to necessarily stop at your gates.
Again, I state that you are fighting something/someone.
Are you the absolute truth thought police?
Anytime you see 'absolute truth' you have to say something...even if it is "i don't know", you still have to say so.
-seek
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site may at times contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml |