|
Greetings Seshatasefekht,
yikes, on one forum we are currently reasoning on the nature of truth, the nature of the devine, the possibilities of an afterlife, and now you go and bring up the dread spectre of free will.
But why not.
So, you are right to pull me up. I really do have to work on my clarity. Lets see if this makes any more sense.
Yes, the environment is all important. So a more acurate vesion of what I was trying to say is you are free to choose what to be every second, but first you have to recognise what you are, and what is around you. Which I suppose begs the question of, would that really be a choice or a reflection of fundamental reality.
Lao Tsu was far more more eloquent than I am ever likely to be on this idea. And George Clinton, of course...
I am still in the process of building a paper glider, the rocket will come a little later down the track. And I may not choose to point it anywhere at all.
love and life
paul
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site may at times contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml |