|
Title: Europe's Hypocritical History of Cannibalism Post by: mdw-ntr on February 01, 2016, 08:23:19 PM "the world’s first cannibal incident reported by multiple, independent, first-hand accounts took place during the Crusades by European soldiers, Rubenstein says. These first-hand stories agree that in 1098, after a successful siege and capture of the Syrian city Ma’arra, Christian soldiers ate the flesh of local Muslims."
"Initially, little bits of pulverized mummies imported from Egypt were used in prescriptions against disease." "While Europeans ate “mummy” to cure their physical ailments, the same culture sent missionaries and colonists to the New World to cure New World indigenous people of their purported barbaric cannibalism, some of which was entirely fabricated as a rationale for conquest, Bowdler says. “It’s certainly possible that Europeans were consuming more human flesh at the time than people in the New World,” Sugg says. “It’s a big paradox,” Noble adds. The term cannibal was being used to describe someone inferior while the “civilized in Europe were also eating bits of the human body,” she says." http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/europes-hypocritical-history-of-cannibalism-42642371/?no-ist (http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/europes-hypocritical-history-of-cannibalism-42642371/?no-ist) |