Title: fyi youtube on AIDS Post by: nomo8 on November 28, 2013, 10:52:13 PM Dr. Willner did not make it past 1994. the 1980 hepatitis vaccine trials in NY, LA and Sn F. are still at issue, not addressed in this youtube video. Perhaps cocktails of known diseases in the hep vaccine trials, not, as has been suggested an engineered virus that "kills only black people," killed only healthy gay men who participated in the experiment. Dovetails with the mass vaccination blood mixing travesty in Africa that is a known admitted fact by the UN - an unfortunate "mistake" blamed on poor local administration. Yet it went on and on........
Clean living and cannabis seems to be the treatment of choice for the AIDS chimera among much of the gay population in the US. The federal govt is grandstanding with support for "gay marriage" and other special "rights" campaigns, distracting this very population from the efforts of the Obama administration to destroy medical cannabis infrastructure while ignoring dubious state efforts to create government controlled taxed vice regimes, where home grown is forbidden, such as Washington State. http://www.whitehouse.gov/ondcp/ondcp-fact-sheets/marijuana-legalization (http://www.whitehouse.gov/ondcp/ondcp-fact-sheets/marijuana-legalization) The HIV/AIDS Hoax Explained - Dr. Robert Willner (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fmpx3bQ40Dg#) Title: Re: fyi youtube on AIDS Post by: Nakandi on November 29, 2013, 12:36:43 PM There is this then (Bee Venom Destroys Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)): http://www.collective-evolution.com/2013/03/13/bee-venom-destroys-human-immunodeficiency-virus-hiv/#sthash.CqYqE7YK.dpuf; (http://www.collective-evolution.com/2013/03/13/bee-venom-destroys-human-immunodeficiency-virus-hiv/#sthash.CqYqE7YK.dpuf;)
From above article: It is also important to note the debate surrounding HIV and AIDS. Findings suggest there is not solid scientific evidence that exists today to prove the existence of HIV. AIDS is also under great debate as in some countries it is considered to be one thing while in another, it is something totally different. One can literally be diagnosed with AIDS in one country but not in another. AIDS is often is simply a term for a HUGE umbrella of potential diseases. The only common factor found amongst definitions is if the body’s T-cell count reduces below a specific level. Why is there such a lack of distinction about what AIDS truly is? Why so many different definitions? |