Carbon Dioxide irrelevant in climate debate says MIT Scientist

[Iniko Ujaama]

http://www.examiner.com/x-7715-Portland-Civil-Rights-Examiner~y2009m8d18-Carbon-Dioxide-irrelevant-in-climate-debate-says-MIT-Scientist


Carbon Dioxide irrelevant in climate debate says MIT Scientist

In a study sure to ruffle the feathers of the Global Warming cabal, Professor Richard Lindzen of MIT has published a paper which proves that IPCC models are overstating by 6 times, the relevance of CO2 in Earth’s Atmosphere. Dr. Lindzen has found that heat is radiated out in to space at a far higher rate than any modeling system to date can account for...

[cont'd link above]

[nomo8]

A study of paleoclimatology is useful in peeling back the layers of this dubious scare tactic.  Why would a gas which is a fundamental building block of plant life on this planet be characterized as a demonic evil, only second to global nulcear war as threat to humanity and the environment?  Honeslty look at what critics say, among them very respected climatologists, meteorolgoists and other non mathmateicians (math and computer scientists who are paid big bucks to prove that "global warming exists") .  Carbon monoxide, now there's something dangerous.  they are distracting us from the real damage done to the atmosphere with toxic chemical effluents, and the oceans, by blaming every percieved threat to the envorinment on "global warming".  Climate fluctuation, varaible conditions of our sun and its fluctuations are invevitable.  the real killer has always been cold,  just ask a white man!  When you are shouted down without logic or reason, it's always a tip off. The nuclear power industry is behind a lot of this scare stuff.  There are even "green" nuclear power advocates .  More absurdity.  A lot of the problem is that oil is under brown and black people's feet.   Al Gore's tobacco farms are much more dangerous than CO2.  N8