Rasta TimesCHAT ROOMArticles/ArchiveRaceAndHistory RootsWomen Trinicenter
Africa Speaks.com Africa Speaks HomepageAfrica Speaks.comAfrica Speaks.comAfrica Speaks.com
InteractiveLeslie VibesAyanna RootsRas TyehimbaTriniView.comGeneral Forums
*
Home
Help
Login
Register
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
December 22, 2024, 06:32:48 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
25912 Posts in 9968 Topics by 982 Members Latest Member: - Ferguson Most online today: 314 (July 03, 2005, 06:25:30 PM)
+  Africa Speaks Reasoning Forum
|-+  GENERAL
| |-+  GENERAL FORUM (Moderators: Tyehimba, leslie, Makini, Zaynab)
| | |-+  Eye and I::Mapping the Sixth Sense
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Eye and I::Mapping the Sixth Sense  (Read 9633 times)
iyah360
Junior Member
**
Posts: 592

Higher Reasoning


« on: January 22, 2004, 08:51:20 AM »

http://www.innovations-report.com/html/reports/studies/report-24916.html

 
University of British Columbia

Mapping the Sixth Sense

Psychology’s Ron Rensink Discovers Visual Sensing Without Seeing

Most of us have felt it before -- that sinking feeling that something is about to happen, that something is not quite right. It’s the stuff of scary movies, X-Files episodes and psychic visits.

But according to a new study by Ron Rensink, an associate professor in both psychology and computer science at UBC, the "sixth sense" is a distinct mode of visual perception and may be something all of us can learn to employ.

He calls it "mindsight" -- the phenomenon where people can sense a change but do not see it (i.e. have a visual experience of it) for several seconds.

"There is something there -- people do have access to this other subsystem," says Rensink, whose findings appear in the January issue of Psychological Science.

"Vision is not just one ability, it’s not just one sense. There is vision for conscious perception -- this picture you have of what’s going on -- and there is also vision for action. It turns out these are two very different subsystems -- one of them is conscious, one of them is non-conscious -- and they actually work slightly differently. That’s why when you’re driving, for example, you can actually tune out and you can drive just fine because this other system takes over."

In a preliminary experiment initially designed to test attention, Rensink presented participants with a photograph of a real-world scene and a modified photograph in a sequence, with a brief gray field between successive images. Participants were asked to hit a button when they saw a change.

But some participants asked if they should hit the button when they actually saw the change -- or when they first felt something happening.

Intrigued, Rensink re-jigged the experiment. Forty participants were instead asked to hit a button once when they sensed a change -- that is, had a "feeling" that a change was occurring - and a second time when they actually saw the change.

Most participants only saw the change. But some sensed a change two or three seconds before they actually saw it.

"About a third of people seem to get this feeling of something happening, of something changing," says Rensink. "You can’t really say what it is, you can’t really say when it is. It’s just a gut feeling... It’s clear whatever it is, they’re using it in their everyday experience."

A noted vision researcher, Rensink spent six years at Cambridge Basic Research, a partnership involving the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Harvard and Nissan Motor Co. Prompted in part by a finding that accidents in city driving were often classified as "driver looked but failed to see," he initially studied "change blindness" (people’s blindness to scene changes) and later conducted the experiments that were part of the mindsight findings.

"In the past, people believed that if light came into your eyes, it would have to result in a picture. If it didn’t result in a picture, it must mean that it can’t be vision.

"What I’m saying is no, that first assumption is wrong. Light can come into your eyes and do other things. There are other perceptual systems and it can result in other forms of experience. It’s all vision -- it’s just a different kind of vision. There is nothing really magical about it. It’s just a different way of perceiving, so it’s a different kind of experience, which I think is actually pretty cool. This is not magical."

But it is controversial.

"It’s not going to make everybody happy," he says matter-of-factly of findings that took more than two years -- and significant verification -- to publish.

"A lot of people feel kind of threatened by this, by the idea that the conscious mind is not necessarily the ultimate in terms of intelligence or control. If you think that the conscious mind is the end-all and be-all, this kind of work is disturbing."

Rensink says people need to trust their gut instincts and believes we can likely train ourselves to hone them.

"In the longer run, it’s worth taking a look at intuition to get more insight into this area," he says. "Maybe this will tend to lead people to develop their intuitions and realize that these intuitions are informative and we should respect them. This may help us in all kinds of endeavours."

In practical terms, Rensink, who is part of a team of UBC researchers investigating the possibilities of intelligent human-automobile interfaces, says if one can actually induce this gut feeling, scientists may be able to use it in cars as a kind of warning.

"What you’d like is a way to say, ‘slow down, or dangerous curve ahead.’ If you’re getting a feeling that something is not quite right, this may in fact get people to be more cautious."

He also thinks it could be applied to the arts, used deliberately, for example, in the cinema to give the audience an even "spookier movie experience."

Rensink plans further analysis to determine what may separate people who have this sense from people who don’t. Is it a personality variable? Is it attitude or mental set? And what part of the brain is responsible?

"If people are capable of this, they are probably capable of a lot more," he says. "We just don’t know yet. We’ll see where it leads us in the future. It could be the start of something interesting -- a whole other way of using vision."

Logged
Yann
Senior Member
****
Posts: 634

Ayanna's Roots


WWW
« Reply #1 on: January 23, 2004, 08:06:26 AM »

Quote
"A lot of people feel kind of threatened by this, by the idea that the conscious mind is not necessarily the ultimate in terms of intelligence or control. If you think that the conscious mind is the end-all and be-all, this kind of work is disturbing."  


Clearly this is a manifestation one of the more damaging distortions of Western linear thinking. I read a most astute observation in a book by Jeremy Naydler called The Temple of the Gods. He spoke of the fact that in the West and especially in the modern era we see things on a vertical plane, we are concerned with what physically exists, what we can perceive in a concrete sense, measure, evaluate etc. A good example of this I suppose would be the western expansion outward in the 16th 17th and 18th centuries, the need to explore the landscape that was outside of their borders. There was no intention to explore the cultures or gain wisdom from these other lands, no idea that this very landscape that they so ruthlessly 'explored' had a life of its own and was both connected to and a manifestation of something that they could not perceive. They did not know that their forays there would hold memories that they would eventually have to reckon with to function in this fast approaching New World Order. Their focus was on the wealth to be gained, the physical exploration.

The 19th century exploration took an even more dangerous turn with the now 'scientific proof' of the inferiority of other races. Here too we see the focus on the exploration of the physical landscape, especially of Africa and the Far East. Scientists, geographers and cartographers became almost indistinguishable from the interests of businessmen, politicians, missionaries and fortune seekers. Their intentions were more or less the same- to measure, to chart, to map, to plunder, to rule.

Ancient civilizations however perceived the world not only in its physical horizontal plane but in a vertical plane i.e. how the landscape, topography, even our own selves were related to the divine.  For them ever thing that could be seen with the eye and perceived in a physical way had a vertical, unseen interior existence. As a result perception could not be limited to the physical or the conscious. What Western scholars perceived as mere symbols when examining the nature of the Gods and Goddesses of the ancient Egyptians was indeed far more. Ra was not simply a 'symbol' of the sun, or Hapi a  'symbol' of the source of the Nile, but the very manifestation of the interior nature of what was physical. What a beautiful and liberating way to perceive creation!  For then this force may now be some thing that one can tap into, and be a real part of instead of some thing that is external to your state of being.

To people with this sophisticated way of seeing, the idea of interior vision would have been rather familiar and nothing to fear at all. But it is no wonder why in these times this would be some thing to be feared by many.  For people that could realize and harness this power within themselves, people that could develop this second sight would be harder to control wouldn't they? With ruthless character refinement, a razor sharp knowledge of history and the development of their relationship with their own interior and the same interior, mindscape of all of creation around us, these people could become a destabilizing force against a system that has benefited and profited from the distortion that the only way of being, seeing, experiencing and living is on the linear, physical plane.

This article only gives a glimpse of the possibilities and the source of this second sight and does little to trace the evolutionary pattern or the very logical link between what seems to reside in the region of the intangible senses and our own DNA, brain cells, physical bodies and the scientific laws of nature. It is clear that modern science is only now beginning to catch up with what so called 'inferior races' have known for centuries.

yan



Logged
Tracey
Full Member
***
Posts: 396

Rootsie.com


« Reply #2 on: January 23, 2004, 01:17:52 PM »

Indeed..what a pale and sterile psycho-analytical echo in contrast to the vibrancy with which the ancients seemed to access and utilize within the whole of their sense powers and realm of the living Gods. Possessing not only the literal means to identify with transpersonal energy, or god.. but to such an extent as to even become wholly absorbed and become as a God. Through this identification, a person could be able to achieve many things normally beyond the range of human possibility, thus experiencing what we now call the 'supernatural'..or 'sixth sense' dimension of seeing.

Their lives in relationship to the gods was an integral part of daily life that permeated with the living divine. Having full range of their psychic spiritual faculties; there was no clinical/abstract separtion that we "moderns" tend to compartmentalize within our various modes of thinking. Only integration..as such was evident by manifestation of what we see today only as "physical" remnants from an ancient culture..but from which they had infused eternal aspects of their spiritual divine.

To have the means to 'think outside the box' is quite a literal understatement...yet is something that seems to follow those in modern times who choose to think beyond the linear concepts of the mind.

Quote
To people with this sophisticated way of seeing, the idea of interior vision would have been rather familiar and nothing to fear at all. But it is no wonder why in these times this would be some thing to be feared by many.  For people that could realize and harness this power within themselves, people that could develop this second sight would be harder to control wouldn't they? With ruthless character refinement, a razor sharp knowledge of history and the development of their relationship with their own interior and the same interior, mindscape of all of creation around us, these people could become a destabilizing force against a system that has benefited and profited from the distortion that the only way of being, seeing, experiencing and living is on the linear, physical plane.


This is a very powerful statement Yan, and one that merits deep contemplation. This linear type of thinking has cut us off not only from knowing whole aspects of who we are in relation to the world around us..but also from knowing what powers lie dormant within the recesses of our sleeping minds. What we have the potential to realize within our verticle thinking minds!

Indeed...modern science has alot of catching up to do to what the ancients already knew )))


Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Copyright © 2001-2005 AfricaSpeaks.com and RastafariSpeaks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!