Rasta Times
CHAT ROOM
Articles/Archive
RaceAndHistory
RootsWomen
Trinicenter
Interactive
Leslie Vibes
Ayanna Roots
Ras Tyehimba
TriniView.com
General Forums
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
November 24, 2024, 04:00:10 AM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
25912
Posts in
9968
Topics by
982
Members Latest Member:
-
Ferguson
Most online today:
204
(July 03, 2005, 06:25:30 PM)
Africa Speaks Reasoning Forum
GENERAL
Essays and Reasonings
(Moderators:
Tyehimba
,
leslie
)
room 101
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
...
4
5
[
6
]
7
Author
Topic: room 101 (Read 186615 times)
seshatasefekht7
AfricaSpeaks Member
Posts: 278
RastafariSpeaks
Re: room 101
«
Reply #75 on:
May 04, 2006, 09:29:21 AM »
Practice thinking, speaking, and acting as if your "home" is not a particular place, but, rather, is a system of thought, speech, and action, that supports the revelation of truth in a manner that promotes the practice of justice and correctness.
Reason(s)/ Explanation(s):
In a socio-material system dominated by White Supremacy Racism, it is correct for non-white people to regard "home" as being the combined things that they say, and/or do, that help to find and reveal truth, and use truth in such manner as to promote justice and correctness.
Under White Supremace Racism, it is not possible for any non-white to CORRECTLY regard any GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION as his or her "home".
"Home", for a non-white person should be regarded as a SYSTEM OF BEHAVIOR.
Example:
A Victim of Racism [non-white person] is "at home" anytime that he or she is saying or doing anything that effectively promotes the elimination of Racism White Supremacy, and/or, effectively promotes the practice of justice or correctness.
*******neely fuller jr.
Logged
seshatasefekht7
AfricaSpeaks Member
Posts: 278
RastafariSpeaks
Re: room 101
«
Reply #76 on:
May 04, 2006, 09:34:24 AM »
Speak and act to oppose the belief that White Supremacy (Racism) is “God’s Religion”, or, is a part of, “God’s Religion”.
Reason(s) / Explanation (s):
It has been said that “God made white people for the purpose of serving God, and God made black people for the purpose of serving white people”.
This could be true. There is much to indicate that it is true.
If true, however, there is much to indicate that the smartest and most powerful white people have chosen NOT to “serve God”. There is much to indicate that the smartest and most powerful white people [White Supremacist] have chosen to subvert, and/or replace God. They have, apparently, chosen to “make” themselves “God”. It is unfortunate, non-just, and incorrect for the smartest, and most powerful of the people of the known universe to have organized themselves into a “Race”
{Race, and/or Racism =
1. A system of thought, speech, and action, operated by people who classify themselves as “white”, and who use deceit, violence, and/or the threat of violence, to subjugate, use and/or abuse people classified as “non-white”, under conditions that promote the practice of falsehood, non-justice, and incorrectness, in one or more areas of activity, for the ULTIMATE PURPOSE of maintaining, expanding, and/or refining the practice of White Supremacy (Racism).
2. Unjust speech, action, and/or inaction based on the color, and/or non-color, of persons, and/or factors associated with, the color, and/or non-color, of persons.
3. White Supremacy. }.
Not all white people, presumably, are members of a Race, but, apparently, those who are smarter, and, therefore, more powerful, do function {by choice} as Race Members [Racists / White Supremacist]. They have made Racism their “religion”. They have made Racism into the most powerful “religion” among the people of the known universe, and made themselves the “God” of that “religion”.
To confuse their victims, they have disguised their practice of Racism by using the names and titles of many other religions and social concepts. This has helped them to refine their subjugation and abuse of their victims.
The have chosen to have non-white people “worship” them for being “white” and SUPREME. They have attempted to make God and White Supremacy one and the same. They have done all this for no ultimate purpose than to “glorify” White Supremacy (Racism), and to “glorify” themselves as “White” Supremacists (Racists).
The basic speech and action of a Racist (White Supremacist) is only for the purpose of promoting falsehood, non-justice, and incorrectness as the functional foundation for Racism (White Supremacy).
THE RACISTS ARE MASTERFULLY SKILLED IN THE USE OF DECEIT AND DIRECT VIOLENCE.
It is reasonable to believe that Racism does not serve God. Also, there is no reason to believe that a person can be a Racist, and serve God, AT THE SAME TIME.
If Racism does not serve the purpose(s) of the Creator [God], then it is the DUTY of the Victims of Racism [non-white people], as well as the duty of those white people who are NOT Racists, to speak and act to eliminate Racism. It is also the duty of those white persons who are Racists, to stop being Racist.
If these duties are performed, conditions will then be better for the Creator’s [God’s] purposes to be served.
The value of any “religion” should be determined by how it affects people in the way that they relate to each other, as well as all that is in the universe.
People who have great power were “given” the means and ability to develop that power. If people who have great power use that power to mistreat people, they have, by so doing, destroyed their reason for HAVING that power. It is then the duty of those persons who have been mistreated to persuade those powerful persons to stop misusing that power. IT IS THE DUTY OF THE MISTREATED PERSONS TO CAUSE THESE POWERFUL PERSONS TO BE SEPARATED FROM THEIR POWER. In causing this separation from power, it is correct for the mistreated to use correct social force and/or correct counter-violence.
The correct purpose for producing, receiving, or sharing knowledge, and/or power, is to reveal truth, and to use truth in a manner that produces justice and correctness-------in order to produce “peace”.
No people should do other than this. No people should BE ALLOWED to do other than this.
*******Neely Fuller Jr.
Logged
seshatasefekht7
AfricaSpeaks Member
Posts: 278
RastafariSpeaks
Re: room 101
«
Reply #77 on:
May 04, 2006, 09:44:00 AM »
"Dedication
The Isis Papers: The Keys To The Colors
This work is dedicated to the victims of the global system of white supremacy (racism), all non-white people worldwide, past and present, who have resolved to end this great travesty and bring justice, then peace to planet Earth.
“If you do not understand White Supremacy (Racism)—what it is, and how it works-everything else that you understand, will only confuse you”. ----Neely Fuller, Jr. (1971).
The United Independent Compensatory Code/System/Concept
No persons who classify themselves as white living in the area of the world referred to as the United States of America (or for that matter, in any other area of the world) should presume to tell any Black person (or other non-white person) what racism is or is not, until they have read completely Kenneth O’Reilley’s Racial Matters: The FBI’s Secret File on Black America, 1960-1972.
No Black person living in the area of the world referred to as the United States of America should discourse on racism or deny the conspiratorial dimensions of the local and global system of racism until he/she has read Racial Matters completely.
All non-white people (black, brown, red andyellow) should read and discuss the implications of the book, Racial Matters; the implications for themselves as individuals and the implications for their collective should be discussed in depth. Then, all non-white people should view the docudrama videotape, ‘The Wannsee Conference (which can be rented), to observe exactly how a white supremacy government calmly sits and plans the destruction of a people that it classifies as non-white. The Wannsee Conference took place in Germany, in 1941, to finalize the plans for the destruction of 11,000,000 Semites (non-whites) of the Jewish religion. The German white supremacists succeeded in killing six million.
After the above steps have been taken, all non-white people worldwide should read Neely Fuller’s work. The United Independent Compensatory Code/System/Concept: a textbook/workbook for thought, speech and/or action for victims of racism (white supremacy).
Frances Cress Welsing
Washington, D.C.
August, 1989"
Logged
seshatasefekht7
AfricaSpeaks Member
Posts: 278
RastafariSpeaks
Re: room 101
«
Reply #78 on:
May 05, 2006, 08:58:23 AM »
THE NEUROCHEMICAL BASIS FOR EVIL
The American philosopher William James has stated, “There is no doubt that healthy mindedness is inadequate as a philosophical doctrine, because the evil facts which it positively refuses to account for are a genuine portion of reality, and the may after all be the best key to life’s significance, and possibly the only openers of our eyes to the deepest level of truth”.
The Kabbalah, which literally means “tradition”, is the sum of Jewish mysticism, the tradition of things divine. The Book Bahir, an 1180 a.d. document on the Kabbalah concerning Satan, states,
It teaches that there is in God a principle that is called ‘Evil’, and it lies in the north of God, of it is written [Jer.I:14}: “Out of the north the evil shall break forth upon all the inhabitants of the land’, that is to say, all evil that comes upon all the inhabitants of the land breeds forth out of the north. And what principle is this? It is the form of the hand {one of the seven holy forms which represent God as the original man}, and it has many messengers, and all are named ‘Evil’…..And it is they that fling the world into guilt for the tobu is in the north, and the tobu means precisely the evil that confuses men until they sin, and it is the source of all man’s evil impulses.
In early Egyptian (African) tradition, evil was associated with Set, the brother of Osiris (“Lord of the perfect black”). Set eventually killed his brother Osiris and dismembered his body, which his sister/wife (Isis) helped restore to life. Osiris was the great Egyptian God figure. Set is considered the white brother.
In contrast, the early Christian religion and bible related evil to the fallen angel Lucifer, a word that means light and that can be construed to mean white. However, in the Middle Ages, for some Europeans, the devil took on an appearance of a Black man with a long phallus, which has been modified as the present red colored figure wit a long tail and a long fork.
In keeping with each of the above perspectives of evil, Webster’s Dictionary defines “evil” as : “ 1. morally bad or wrong; wicked, depraved, 2. causing pain or trouble; harmful; injurious, 3. threatening or bringing misfortune; unlucky; disastrous; unfortunate; as an evil hour, 4. resulting from or based on conduct regarded as immoral; as an evil reputation.”
The Cress Theory of Color Confrontation and Racism (White Supremacy), links whites’ unjust behavior towards people of color (black, brown, red and yellow) to whites’ inability to produce melanin skin pigment in the skin melanocyte. The whites’ numerical minority status in the world and , ultimately, their fear of global white genetic annihilation by the genetically dominant, skin melanin producing, non-white world majority are pointed out as additional reasons for white aggression towards people of color. This thesis helps to explain the evil “kill or be killed” behaviors of the global white collective in relation to non-white people.
In 1972, I presented a paper entitled, “Melanin: The Neurochemical Basis for Soul”, at the annual meeting of the National Medical Association Section on Neurology and Psychiatry. I theorized that the presence of melanin in high concentrations in Blacks accounted for some of the observable differences in behavior between Black and white People(I.e., religious responsiveness, rhythm, emotional responsiveness, sensitivity levels), noting the familiar saying amongst older Black people, “the blacker the berry, the sweeter the juice; if it ain’t got no soul, it ain’t got no use. Also, I emphasized the song by James Brown, “We Got More Soul.” Further, I pointed out that the most sensitive body areas are the areas most highly pigmented.
Fifteen years ago in a paper entitled, “Blacks, Hypertension and the Active Skin Melanocyte” (Journal of Urban Health, 1975), I posited melanin, among other things as a possible neurotransmitter and the skin melanocytes as the foundation of the sixth sense – the basis for knowledge of the unseen, including a deeper knowledge of “bad”. I explained that if the melanocytes were sense receptors and melanin was a neuro- transmitter, then the darker the skin, the higher the levels of hypertension found. Primarily, this is true because people with darker skins are more sensitive to the energy currents around them. If those energy currents are stressful, they will be more stressed, increasing levels of hypertension.
In 1987, at the first Melanin Conference, I discussed The Cress Theory on the George Washington Carver Phenomenon, suggesting that the skin melanocytes of this very Black-skinned scientist (high level concentration of melanin skin pigment) enabled him to communicate with the energy frequencies emanating from plants. Thus, he was able to learn their secrets and purposes.
Since my 1972 presentation on the neurochemical basis for soul, the neurochemical basis of evil has periodically come to my mind, begging that I outline my thoughts on evil as the anti-thesis of soul. I relate soul to order, spirituality and the affirmation of life. I equate evil with chaos and destruction, especially the destruction of life. (The word evil when spelled backward is, live.) The discussion of evil takes on even more significant proportions in light of the increasing number of persons in this society who openly are proclaiming themselves to be worshippers of the Devil – Devil being the arch doer of evil – in contrast to worshipping God. Reportedly, these persons participate in the ritual murder of human beings.
The concept of evil is not at all unusual in religious and philosophical discourse. Also, evil has been a frequent subject for literary exploration. (The novel Moby Dick by Herman Melville is an example of the symbolic discussion of evil in classical American literature.) Evil is approached less often in the natural sciences, including modern medicine. However, psychiatry is the one branch of modern medicine that has major antecedents in both religion and philosophy and thus, the topic of evil has found discussants who consider themselves scientists and scientific.
The role of the psychiatric-physician or physician-scientist is to attempt to comprehend, bringing greater clarity and insight, the total spectrum of human behavior, which would include the special category of behavioral phenomena recognized as evil. Further, I believe that the challenge of modern psychiatry, like the challenge of modern physics, is to approach, if possible, a view of the “unified field”.
Modern physics, since Albert Einstein, has sought to unite the spectrum of forces – gravity, electromagnetism, weak and strong forces – in a unified field, viewing these separate forces as outgrowths from or manifestations of a whole (a unified force field). Likewise, modern psychiatry should seek to discover if there is a united behavioral force field that can explain evil as well as other dominant behavioral phenomena.
For the ant, the greatest evil consists of killing ants. For the human being, the greatest evil consists of the obsessional degrading and killing of other human beings. All lesser evils are simply added to this (ie., destruction of other life forms, destruction of the planet and destruction that extends beyond planet Earth). With evil so defined, clearly there is that extends beyond planet Earth). With evil so defined, clearly there is an overwhelming atmosphere of evil in the world. In fact, the entire planet exists in an atmosphere of degradation and murder. To ignore this evidence of evil, this obsession with mass killing and death, is only to participate in the establishment and the maintenance of its reality – in effect, to participate in evil. On the other hand, to address this obsession with mass death and the degradation of human life in hopes on countering it is to affirm the dignity of human beings and the universe.
Ernest Becker, in his book Escape From Evil, had the following to say about evil: “All organisms want to perpetuate themselves, continue to experience and to live…For all organisms, then, opposing and obliterating power is evil – it threatens to stop experience.” He continues, “So we see that as an organism man is fated to perpetuate himself and as a conscious organism he is fated to identify evil as the threat to that perpetuation. And what then would be the highest development and use of those [man’s] talents? To contribute to the struggle against evil.”
However, before there can be effective struggle against evil, the following questions must be answered: 1) What are the dynamic conditions in a society or culture that would stimulate such activity as announced as devil worship? 2) What are they dynamics in a society and culture wherein increasing numbers of Black males are being killed daily/yearly at epidemic levels? 3) What are the exact causation dynamics in a society and culture wherein the greatest percentage of its resources are used in the development and production of instruments of death and destruction? 4) What are the exact dynamic conditions in a power system or culture wherein 50 million people can be destroyed in the course of slave trade, as on the continent of Africa? 5) What are the exact dynamic conditions in a power system or culture wherein six million Semites of the Jewish religion can be destroyed deliberately or 20 million people killed in the course of a war, such as the Soviet Union during World War II? 6) What are the dynamics in a society and culture in which hundreds of thousands, possibly millions, are doomed to die of infection with a virus that increasing numbers are concluding was deliberately man-made?
These are questions that the psychiatrist should be motivated to answer in the context of understanding the issue of evil, especially, when it is recalled, as stated by Thomas Mecton in his Raids on the Unspeakable that,
One of the most disturbing facts that came out in the [Adolph] Eichman trial was that
Psychiatrist examined him and pronounced him perfectly sane. We equate sanity with
a sense of justice, with humaneness, with prudence, with the capacity to love and
understand other people. We rely on the sane people of the world to preserve it from
barbarism, madness, destruction. And now it begins to dawn on us that is it precisely
that sane ones who are the most dangerous. It is the sane one, the well adapted one,
who can without qualms and without nausea aim the missiles and press the buttons
that will initiate the great festival of destruction that they, the sane ones, have
prepared.
Psychiatrist M. Scott, in his nationwide best selling book, People of the Lie, The Hope for Healing Human Evil, contends, “Science has also steered clear of the problem of evil because of the immensity of the mystery involved…we do not yet have a body of scientific knowledge of human evil deserving of being called a psychology.” He also states,
Those of us who are Caucasians seem to have fewer compunctions about killing
Blacks or Indians or Orientals than we do in killing our fellow white men. It is easier
For a white man to lynch a “nigger” than a “redneck”…The matter of the racial
Aspects of intra-species killing is yet another one deserving significant scientific
investigation.
He concludes, “ war today is at least as much a matter of national pride as of racial pride.”
Even though Peck suggests that science has steered clear of the subject of evil because of the “immense mystery involved, “Herman Melville, the 19th century novelist, perhaps subconsciously, went directly to the subject of evil. He approached “evil” through the symbolism of the white whale, Moby Dick, and the crippled white ship captain who pursued him. Ahab (who is often compared to Satan). Melville uses an entire chapter of his book to discourse on “The Whiteness of the Whale.” He begins,
What the White whale was to Ahab, has been hinted, what, at times, he was to me, as
yet remains unsaid. Aside from those more obvious considerations touching Moby
Dick, which could not but occasionally awaken in any man’s soul some alarm, there
was another thought, or rather vague, nameless horror concerning him, which at times
by its intensity completely overpowered all the rest; and yet so mystical and well nigh
ineffable was it, that I almost despair of putting it in a comprehensible form. It was
the whiteness of the what that above all things appalled me. But how can I hope to
explain myself here; and yet, in some dim, random way, explain myself I must, else
all these chapters might be naught.
Melville proceeds to detail many positive associations with whiteness:” and though this pre-eminence in it [whiteness] applies to the human race itself, giving the white man ideal mastership over every dusky tribe.” He continues,
…yet for all these accumulated associations, with whatever is sweet, and honorable,
And sublime, there yet lurks and elusive something in the innermost idea of this hue,
which strikes more of panic to the soul than that redness which affrights in blood…
That ghastly whiteness it is which imparts such an abhorrent mildness even more
loathsome than terrific, to the dumb gloating of their aspect. So that not the fierce-
fanged tiger in his heraldic coat can so stagger courage as the white-shrouded bear or
shark.
Further on, Melville contemplates,
What is that in the Albino man so peculiarly repels and often shocks the eye, as that
Sometimes he is loathed by his own kith and kin! It is that whiteness which invests
Him, a thing expressed by the name he bears, The Albino is as well made as other men
- has no substantive deformity – and yet this mere aspect of all-pervading whiteness
makes him more strangely hideous than the ugliest abortion. Why should this be so?
Again referring to whiteness, Melville writes, “..it is at once the most meaning symbol of spiritual things, nay, the very veil of the Christian’s deity; and yet should be as it is, the intensifying agent in things the most appalling to mankind.
Melville’s Captain Ahab sees the white whale as all evil of which he is in pursuit. In a letter to Nathaniel Hawthorne, Melville referred to Moby Dick as a “wicked book”. My own interpretation of the symbolism in this novel, which has been regarded as the greatest of all American novels is, that the crippled white Captain Ahab represents the mutant (global) white population, afflicted with albinism (whiteness). The white whale is symbolic of racism (white supremacy), the major pursuit of the global white collective – the evil destructive goal of the global white collective. This furious, evil pursuit in Moby Dick ends in a disaster for all: a deadly end in which the white ship captain and all of his crew, whites and non-whites alike are destroyed. Yet, one survived to tell the tale, foretelling the end of white supremacy as a specified power dynamic.
It is not surprising that this novel containing the symbolism of albinism and white supremacy was written prior to the great bloody conflict (The American Civil War) that had so much to do with the relationships between white (albino) and Black people. This conflict ended the power of the share holders as well as the formal enslavement of Black people by whites.
Melville’s linkage of evil and dread with the condition of albinism parallels my own thesis that the absence of the neuropeptide melanin-the absence of this black pigment in the skin and other aspects of the nervous system – critically impairs the depth sensitivity of the nervous system and the ability to tune in to the total spectrum of energy frequencies in the universe. This deficiency of sensory awareness sets the stage for the absence of harmony (the chaos and destruction), which is evil. Thus, the injustice and evil of white supremacy not only has its foundation in the numerical minority status of the global white population and its genetically recessive status in terms of melanin pigment production, but the very absence of melanin in the nervous system in significant degrees (decreasing sensory input and thus sensitivity) is an additional contributing factor in the problem of white supremacist injustice. White supremacy is the greatest known evil on Earth. Likewise, racism (white supremacy) is the unified force field that encompasses all of the lesser evils we now recognize. Indeed, if the absence of melanin obstructs the nervous system’s ability to tune in to the total spectrum of frequencies in the universe, rendering those lacking melanin incapable of acting in harmony with those frequencies, then it becomes incumbent upon those possessing melanin to counteract the evil.
The Isis Papers: The Keys To The Colors; chapt.19,
THE NEUROCHEMICAL BASIS FOR EVIL
by Dr Frances Cress Welsing
Logged
seshatasefekht7
AfricaSpeaks Member
Posts: 278
RastafariSpeaks
Re: room 101
«
Reply #79 on:
May 05, 2006, 09:02:57 AM »
peace and hotep,
KEMETISM EXPOSES:
THE HEBREW JEW
So what’s some the key factors that today’s so-called jews make when attempting to validate the legacy of the judeo-faith. Well for starters the claim that they are GOD’s “chosen” people! That proclamation is supposedly predicated on “their” story that nearly 4000 years ago they were hardworking mixed (semite) skinned people mistreated by cruel black-skinned indigenous African leadership in a place called Kemet(Egypt). And it was their endurance of that mistreatment that prompted “GOD” to choose them as “his” people to save and protect from the criminally harsh rulership of KEMET. The way I see it, the only realistic way to find out if this jew claim is accurate is to match up the time-frame that the jews themselves claim that these “historical” events to place. Now with that said, because these events “supposedly” took place in KEMET(Egypt), all we have to do is track Kemetic historic truth and use that truth as the weight to either legitimize or de-legitimize the jewish religious claims. Supposedly, according to the bible, between 1800 and 1700 (bce), these people, called the infamous “Israelites –children of Israel,” entered KEMET as 70 shepherds divided into 12 patriarchal families.
During the period of 2150-2040(bce), known as the first intermediate period, integration with malice minded Asiatic foreigners caused Kemet’s proficient and powerful spiritual structure, as well as mercantile strength and defense power to gradually decline. That decline ultimately led to political instability and unstable social relations among Kemet’s masses. The foreigner’s two-faced interaction and negative influence on indigenous Kemetic citizens created wide-spread tension among Kemet’s leadership and the public masses. Mentuhotep I (11th dynasty period 2014 bce), took all of this in consideration and concluded that the only chance Kemit had to develop constructively in conjunction with NETER’s (GOD) plan for African humanity (MAAT) and unite the two lands was to expel all of the distractions,. Therefore, by governmental order, all Asiatic foreigners had to leave Kemet voluntarily or be forced out militarily. Consequently, in 2040(bce), the negative element of foreign criminal intent was defeated and Mentuhotep II(son of Mentuhotep I) once again united upper and lower Kemet, relocating the capital to Waset(Thebes-Karnak/Luxor).
Senwosret I of the 12th dynastic period continued Mentuhotep’s efforts and extended the Kemetic kingdom through the Sinai-peninsula and continuing up through the Tigris and Euphrates river (Iraq). In fact, senwosret captured so many invading Europeans in the processs that he had to sep up a colony in their bare territory just to maintain them. Forming in the process the city of Athens(Greece) in 1897 (bce).
Asians and Europeans spent centuries expelled from the Kemetic Kingdom. After expulsion from Kemit one particular faction of semitic Aryan-europeans who after expulsion from Kemet relocated in and around the sinai peninsula(Palestine). This group stands out because it was they who initiated the next war campaign against Kemet. They understood the military power, and even more intriguing, the unique richness of Kemet. Their schematic plan was first to recruit other foreigners to assist them in the militant overthrow of Kemet. Their war-mission was subsequently welcomed by the arabs, Asians, Europeans, and practically all other non- Africans. That unification formed the populist coalition supposedly needed to defeat the Kemetic kingdom. Their strategy was to move by chariot-horse quietly in the south (upper) and then strike the north ((a for 233 years (1783-1550bce). However, while in control it should be noted that they contributed of formulated NOTHING in regards to Kemetic creative advancement. As a matter of fact, there are no historic symbolisms, icons, or written documentation by them that would even let you know they were there. In 1550 (18th dynasty) Kemetic forces, under the direction of Ahmose I (Nebpehti-Ra), and his youthful son, Amonhotep I (Tcheser-Ka-Ra), defeated the hyksos and once again expelled them from Kemetic soil. What happened next with the expelled hyksos is the actual beginning of Judaism. That beginning starts with one particular group of the hyksos coalition. That group is none other than the hyksos organizers, the semitic-aryan indo-europeans. After expulsion, and having absolutely zero optimism in returning to Kemit to do battle with the powerful 18th dynasty, they congregated in the Sinai mountains and formed what turned out to be an extremely diabolical systematic plot. That plot entailed criminal plagiarism for the purpose of fraudulently selling themselves to other Asians and Europeans as spiritually superior to the powerful MAAT promoting Africans. Their initial scheme was to plagiarize all, or as much as possible, “STOLEN” Kemetic symbolism’s that spelled out the Africans BA-spiritual and MAAT-humanistic connection with NETER (GOD) that information was provided in a variety of ways. Documentation, in the form of papyri-interpretations of conceptual scenarios, painted expressions of daily life, recorded war-events, MAAT-RA ceremonies, etc., were just some of the transmitted forms of material expressing the Kemetic African’s comprehension of GOD as well as the purpose and MAAT-policy for social development. Again, the “FALSE” claim to kemetic knowledge was the ultimate goal. Re-documentation was fairly easy to formulate for the semitic Aryan-hyksos because during their 233 years of occupancy they had collected a large quantity of Kemetic ideology which was written on temple walls, tombs, the sarcophagus of the deceased, amulets, etc. once collected and reformatted(NAMES AND PLACES changed), the semitic Aryan-hyksos’s plan was to promote to their surrounding European-asian neighbors and all other non- Africans outside of Kemet the fraud that it was actually their creative mind that formulated the powerful Kemetic thought.
This so-called story supposedly starts with Abraham, who led the semitic Aryan-hyksos(historically RE- classified as the ‘children of israel’) from northern Mesopotamia(iraq) because of famine. At this point there’s an unaccountable time gap, and then as the story goes this group “settles” in “Egypt(KEMET)” as 70 shepherds divided into 12 tribes. First of all, there is no such thing as “SETTLED”. In the real sense of the word, settle means invade-kill-steal. Never in the human “times” of this world has a NON- African (foreign) group left their territorial habitation and went to foreign lands (AFRICA) with the intent of subscribing to that indigenous lands ideology and method of social and spiritual structure. Instead, they either come to implement their own foreign ideologies to the people of that land, or as was the case of Abraham, the people was mentally deficient and incapable of consciously digesting the intricate system of MAAT. THE REASON IS TO JUSTIFY THEIR MALICIOUS INTENT WHICH IS STEALING THE RICH LAND, THE MINERALS THAT COME WITH THE LAND, AND THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLE WHO INHABIT THE LAND. The bottom line is: settlers have always been ‘greedy and murderous’ foreign invaders.
Britain, supposedly, “settled” southern Africa and murdered millions in the process. England, spain, and Portugal, supposedly settled the “americas”, murdering 300 million Indians and genociding many tribal-sects in the process. Europe “settled” the entire continent of Africa, murdering millions of Africans and genociding many Africans groups in the process. All the time stealing the indigenous land, the spiritual and scientific knowledge that came with that land, then acting to revise it, throw it on a European format, and proclaim it as their creation. You do not go to somebody’s clean house with the intention to steal and kill the inhabitants land and property and receive a warm welcome. Now, as the “story” goes the semitic Aryan-hyksos (Israelites or children of Israel), claimed to be wandering migrants who under the leadership of Abraham moved to caanan (present day Palestine-israel) somewhere around 1800bce. The story twist at that point and the focus turns to abraham’s second son Isaac who for some strange reason decides to change his name to jacob. Then, as the “story” goes, jacob’s son joseph is sold by his brothers into slavery in Kemet. There he ultimately becomes a vice-regent and sends for all seventy of his immediate relatives to live in Kemet in high governmental positions. The fact of the matter is that entire episode is a bare-faced lie, constructed by the semitic Aryan-hyksos (Israelites) for the purposed of recruiting sympathetic support from white barbarians and other sea-peoples (Hittites, greeks, Assyrians, philistines, etc.), who now separated themselves from the hyksos movement and was in the process of structuring their own new agenda toward advancing militarily inside Kemet. Now to find out what is fact and what is fraud, all we have to do is match the verbal accusations and proclamations. The key is simple, if and when truth can be proven; it remains truth. If and when the construct of a lie cannot be justified, it remains a lie. The time period in which the accusations cover must be traced. The mind-set of the African-accused, and the political, spiritual, and social structure of the African-accused must be traced for validity. Also, events, accomplishments, and circumstances involving the African-group (Kemetians/Egyptians) whose character is held in defamation by this “historical” jew-tale must be traced. Once traced for validity, the weight of the truth-scale can only tip in favor of African truth, OR semitic Aryan-hyksos (Israelites)FRAUD!
TRACK THE PERIOD IN QUESTION 1800-------------1200 BCE
1783-1550: first of all, it is eye-witness documented historical fact that from 1783-1550, the semitic Aryan-hyksos (Israelites) invaded and ruled Kemet. They attributed nothing, but “ruled”. So if joseph was sold into slavery he was sold to the semitic Aryan-hyksos(Israelites) NOT the Kemetic Africans. Also, if the semitic Aryan-hyksos(Israelites)were tortured thereafter, they were tortured by their own people. Also in question is the natural posture of leadership in Kemet and the social climate of Kemetic Africa. Temple leaders were defenders of maat. Their rise to leadership level heavily depended on their determination, motivation, and skill to unify and /or stabilize the two lands (upper and lower Kemet). In fact, in order to reach community leadership positions in Kemet you had to be observed and credited by the public masses, as well as the council of elder that represented the massed, as a powerful promoter and practitioner of maat.
Kemet was not formulated for battle purposes, but rather for spiritual, mental, social, and environmental development. All of this was/is in documentation drawn from eyewitness accounts and written testimony provided by leaders, assistants, record keepers and admirers. Written essays of Kemet’s structure of ba-maat spiritualism, socialism, defense, harvest, etc. , were also well papyri-documented. Also available for assessment were the writings on behalf of the lives of living/or deceased leaders. All this documentation was written in Medu-Neter (hieroglyphics) on papyri, tombs, amulets, etc.
Documented history shows that during the dynastic period, the majority, if not all of Kemet’s battles were inside their own home (kemet). “ DEFENDING” and keeping out the invading hyksos coalition, and other non- African groups who were comprised of Asians, arabs and Europeans. The documented facts will prove that Kemet was “NEVER” the slave society like that shameful Hollywood movie “ten commandments” wanted the world to believe. In the last one hundred years alone, excavations (or thievery) at the tombs in sahara, giza, and other Kemetic locations have located the shallow graves of tomb workers who were basically divisioned as brick workers, ditch diggers, chiselers, etc. what’s most important though is the inscriptions on their toms and the walls around the tombs. These inscriptions unequivocally state that the workers were respected skilled workers who had union-styled representation, were taxed differently by trade, and were rewarded with leadership promotions and ultimately mason status. A status that was extremely admirable to the workers, the council of elders, and Kemet’s chief leadership. Kemit, absolutely, unequivocally was not a dictatorship community. For that reason, joseph or anybody else could not have been sold into slavery, in Kemet(Egypt).
1550--------1320 BCE
The dynasty following Kamose’s (1605) successful naval attack against apophis’s hyksos forces saw Ahmose I (1550), lead the offensive that ultimately defeated the hyksos. That victory founded Kemet’s strongest line of leadership, the powerful 18th dynasty. Joined by his side was his wife Queen Nefertai, their son Amenhotep I and daughter Ahmaat. Thutmose I married Ahmaat and thereby became the next leader of Kemet. Next in the Kemetic line of leadership was Thutmose’s daughter, Queen Hatshepsut(1475). Hatshepsut may have been the strongest female leader in all Kemetic-dynastic times. She is well documented as not only having an aggressive personality. She was directly responsible for kemet’s expansion of foreign trade, strength of national defense, implementation of community building programs and the build up of a large and effective nave fleet for war and commerce purposed.
Qween Hatshepsut, initially gain the throne as a regent because Thutmose III was to young to take the throne. When Thutmose III finally became chief Kemetic leader, he had so much jealousy and animosity towards the former queen, that he, undermined her accomplishments by destroying all documents baring her name as well as erasing her name off all monuments. He even went as far as chiseling her name off of documents, monuments etc. and installing his name, fraudulently taking credit for the accomplishments of Queen Hatshepsut.
This act of schematic vengeance proved to be the systematical platform in which the white Greco-roman, euro-christian and Moslem arabs used to destroy African features on statues, sphinx, etc. in a fraudulent attempt to erace factual history and substitute it with their own self styled tales. Underneath this group was Amenhotep III (1391), who led kemet at its most expansive and strongest period. Beside him was his most powerful wife Qween Tye and their son Amenhotep IV or Anknaton. After serving 17 years as Kemet’s leader, Anknaton died and was replaced by his son tutankhamon who died violently after taking the throne. Between the subsequent time periods is when the fraudulent claim that moses took the so-called ten commandments(plagiarist duplications of 42 admonition laws) up to mt. Sinai(1346). The 19th dynastic period opened up with Seti I. he oversaw the construction of his own tomb in the valley of the kings. His temple to this day is still one of the peaks of ancient Kemetic art. A scene on one of the walls in the back chamber describes Seti’s participation in the ritual practice of the eternal soul in the last judgement. In realistic terms, these godly sentiments hardly belong to the mind-set of a man who “supposedly” teaches his son, Rameses II, the craft of cruelty. Succeeding the reign of Seti I , who was Kemetic leader from (1306-1290, began the dynastic reign of the twelve Rameses Kings. The Rameses rule continued through about (1080), most notable in this line was Rameses II and Rameses III.
The defeat of the semitic Aryan-hyksos(Israelites) by ahmoses I (18th dynastic period) marked the end of any mentioning of the semitic Aryan-hyksos in Kemetic writings, all invasions after this period (which is documented in Kemetic records) were dominated by whit/European barbarians or sea-peoples, who had separated themselves from the semitic Aryan-hyksos and were comprised of greeks, Assyrians, romans, philistines, sumerians,etc. these white/European barbarian invaders were attempting to capture and misuse Kemet’s food and healing solutions along with Kemet’s mineral wealth. European body contamination was of wide-spread knowledge in Kemet. In turn, kemetic officials made several attempts to provide food support, but the continued insubordinate criminal behavior by the white barbaric sea peoplesl minimized any type of respectfully intended humanitarian act. Nevertheless, Rameses II and Rameses III still sent vast amounts of wheat to famine stricken Europe. Now this act of humanitarian consideration to a bunch of white criminals who come to “your house” to steal, kill and plagiarize, hardly matches the white judeo Christian ‘s definition of ‘Pharoah Rameses’ as some type of strict maniac! For millenniums the European (hyksos) jews and the white so-called christians have been desperately trying to sell the world on the lie that it was the semitic Aryan-hyksos(children of Israel) who were brutally mistreated by Rameses (1290). When the documented truth explicitly details that during this time period it was actually the white euro-barbarian sea people who invade Kemet with the criminal intent to steal, kill and plagiarize, but were defeated and imprisoned by the defense forces of Rameses II.
This proves that Rameses II NEVER defended against the hyksos (children of Israel), and all the scenes on the walls of the temples are actually depicting Rameses II striking the captured white criminal European invaders NOT the semitic Aryan-hyksos (children of Israel)
European and ‘christianized’ African scholar have always proclaimed that the 19th Dynasty under Pharaoh Rameses II under Pharaoh Rameses II was responsible for torturing the ‘jews’ until they were rescued by so-called ‘moses’. Of course this 19th dynasty date (1290) does not correspond with the proposed date (1346 or 1220) of moses’s proposed Mt Sinai trip. But dates formulated to support a fraud never do. This entire story is just that, a FICTITIOUS story! Nothing more than a fraud perpetuated by the deceitful semitic Aryan-hyksos (children of Israel). Their reason for constructing this lie was to justify themselves as spiritually superior over the Kemetic ‘black-skinned’ African with the hopes that their fraudulent claim of ‘superiority’ would win them European and asian allies that would in turn respect their ’religious’ proclamations and sympathize with their much traveled social mis-condition. So-called ‘moses’ (scapegoat representative), never existed! And in all likelihood neither did Abraham. However, given the foundational time-period of Judaism, and the fact that HYKSOS means chief-shepherd, and ‘Abraham’ was supposed to be a wandering shepherd, it is quite possible that biblical Abraham is actually hyksos general Apophis .
It really makes no difference if he was or not, one thing for sure is that he wasn’t who “they “ say he was, nor did he do what “they”(jews/Christians/muslims) claim he did.
From 1000(bce) down to 598(bce), when the Babylonian armies under the direction of nebuchanezzer demolished the city of Jerusalem, there were notable players who represented the hyksos-coalition fraud (david, Solomon, etc). the semitic Aryan-hyksos felt yet another set back when they were defeated and expelled from Jerusalem (a city in Palestine) by nebuchanezzer’s army. That expulsion signaled the formation of Zionism. Unable to regain the land by military force, the semitic Aryan-hyksos sought out to sell their fraudulent ‘survival’ story in an all-out effort to gain foreign support in their NEW claim of a Palestinian region of the Sinai peninsula territory that they had NEVER claimed before. Reason being, their ambition was always to re-enter Kemet(Egypt) . when that became a long-shot they tried to claim the last territory where their majority masses ended up (Sinai peninsula). Their real two millennium goal, up to that point, was to recruit foreign assistance, RE-ENTER KEMET, and live ‘lazy’ off what they considered to be Kemet’s riches. But they now considered that a lost cause being that Persia who now occupied Palestine(539) under cambysses, had also, shortly after that occupancy, invaded and conquered Kemet. The Semitic Aryan-hyksos allies as being distrustful people because of the way they hid their ‘other’ agenda from the rest of the hyksos coalition during the 1783(bce) coalition invasion of Kemet. The semitic Aryan-hyksos (Israelites) was gradually gaining a reputation among the descendants of their former euro-asian hyksos allies as being distrustful people because of the way they hid their ‘other’ agenda from the rest of the hyksos-coalition during the 1783 (bce) coalition invasion of Kemet. The semitic Aryan-hyksos (Israelites) then, without merit or justification designated the territory that they had previously occupied in the Sinai peninsula theirs. RE-naming it ‘juda’, after jacob’s son ‘judah’. And it was that lie that ultimately laid the foundation for Judaism. From outside’ the territory of juda, the semitic Aryan –hyksos (Israelites) classified themselves as “ Hebraic tribe of Judah.”
Now they were set. A ‘new’ identity: Hebrews/Hebrew Israelites/jews. Their fraudulent survival story was called “the torah or pentateuch’ (or the first five books of the bible): genesis, exodus, Leviticus, numbers, Deuteronomy
In summary: the jews, proclaiming to be ‘children of ‘god’, the truth is, they are the actual semitic Aryan-hyksos whose lineage, origin, and legacy begins and ends with criminality, barbarism and deceit. It is important to dissect the lies told by the semitic Aryan-hyksos (Israelites) in the Pentateuch (old testament)
Chapter 7
KEMETISM EXPOSES:
THE HEBREW JEW
FROM THE PHILOSOPHY OF MAAT KEMETIC- SOULISM,
EXPOSES THE DIABOLICAL SYSTEM OF
GLOBAL EUROPEAN IMPERIALISM
By Maaxeru Tep
Logged
seshatasefekht7
AfricaSpeaks Member
Posts: 278
RastafariSpeaks
Re: room 101
«
Reply #80 on:
May 05, 2006, 09:08:13 AM »
peace and hotep,
"The Klan's Favorite Law
Gun control in the postwar South
Dave Kopel
If you believe everything that Michael Moore says in Bowling for Columbine and his books, then you would think that "pro-gun" people are white racists, and that "gun control" would be a wonderful way to help minorities. But a look at America's past reveals what historian Clayton Cramer has accurately called "The Racist Roots of Gun Control."
After the Civil War, the defeated Southern states aimed to preserve slavery in fact if not in law. The states enacted Black Codes which barred the black freedmen from exercising basic civil rights, including the right to bear arms. Mississippi's provision was typical: No freedman "shall keep or carry fire-arms of any kind, or any ammunition."
Under the Mississippi law, a person informing the government about illegal arms possession by a freedman was entitled to receive the forfeited firearm. Whites were forbidden to give or lend freedman firearms or knives.
The Special Report of the Anti-Slavery Conference of 1867 complained that freedmen were "forbidden to own or bear firearms and thus.rendered defenseless against assaults" by whites. Or as a letter printed in the Jan. 13, 1866 edition of Harper's Weekly observed: "The militia of this county have seized every gun found in the hands of so-called freedmen in this section of the county. They claim that the Statute Laws of Mississippi do not recognize the Negro as having any right to carry arms."
Congress' "Report of the Joint Committee on Reconstruction" set forth the factual case for the need for a 14th Amendment to protect the liberties enumerated in the federal Bill of Rights. At the Committee's hearings, General Rufus Saxon testified that all over the South, whites were "seizing all fire-arms found in the hands of the freedmen. Such conduct is in clear and direct violation of their personal rights as guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States, which declares that 'the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.'"
Despite the statutes, and at the suggestion of Reconstruction governors and other leaders, blacks often formed militias to resist white terrorism. For example, in June 1867 in Greensboro, Alabama, the police let the murderer of a black voting registrar escape; in response, a freedman who would later serve in the Alabama State Legislature urged his fellow freedmen to create a permanent militia. "Union League" militias were formed all over central Alabama.
The freedmen slipped from white control. One planter protested that his workers were "turbulent and disorderly," coming and going when they wished, as if they had a choice whether or not to work. The Union League, protested another ex-master, was advising freedmen "to ignore the Southern white man as much as possible...to set up for themselves."
The next spring, the Ku Klux Klan came to central Alabama. The Klansmen, unlike the freedmen, had horses, and thus the tactical advantages of mobility. In a few months, the Klan triumph was complete. One freedman recalled that the night riders, after reasserting white control, "took the weapons from might near all the colored people in the neighborhood."
The same dynamic existed throughout the South. Sometimes militias consisting of freedmen or Unionists were able to resist the Klan or other white forces. In places like the South Carolina back-country, where the blacks were a numerical majority, the black militias kept white terrorists at bay for long periods.
While many blacks participated in informal, local militias, most of the reconstruction governors set up official state militias that were racially integrated. Like many other facets of the reconstruction governments (and the racist governments which followed them), the integrated "black" state militias were corrupt. The state militias, which sought to protect the state governments and the election process, were frequently in conflict with informal white militias. Arms shipments from the federal government to arm the militias were often intercepted and seized by white militias.
Official or unofficial, the black militias were the primary target of the white racist resistance. "Pitchfork" Ben Tillman, the U.S. Senate advocate of racism for many decades, joined a "Sweetwater Sabre Club" whose members seized control of South Carolina's Edgefield Country from a black militia in 1874-75, and attacked a black militia at Hamburg, South Carolina in 1876.
In areas where the black militias lost and the Klan or other white groups took control, "almost universally the first thing done was to disarm the negroes and leave them defenseless," wrote Albion Tourgeé in his 1880 book The Invisible Empire. (An attorney and civil rights worker from the north, Tourgeé would later represent the civil rights plaintiff in Plessy v. Ferguson.)
The Klan's objective in disarming the blacks was to leave them unable to defend their rights, a Congressional hearing found. Afraid of race war and retribution, whites were terrified at the mere sight of a black with a gun. As legal historian Kermit Hall notes, "From the southern white's point of view, a well-armed Negro militia was precisely what John Brown had sought to achieve at Harpers Ferry in 1859."
The Vicksburg white riot of 1874 typified the problem. According to a Congressional investigation, the whites conducted, "Unauthorized searches by self-constituted authority into private homes, searches for arms converted, as is unusual, into robbery and thieving...." The Congressional Report detailed one arms roundup:
One poor old man, half crazed, but harmless, sitting quietly in a neighbor's house, is brutally shot to death in the presence of terrified women and shrieking children. He gained his wretched living by hunting and fishing, and had a shot-gun. No one pretended that Tom Bidderman had anything to do with the fight, but he was black, and had a gun in his house, and so they murdered him for amusement as they were going from the city to restore order in the country.
The Radical Republican Congress observed the South with dismay. The Republicans intended to use federal power to force freedom on the South. One of the Radical Republicans' most important tools was the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, which required states to respect basic human rights. While the vague language of the amendment has produced disagreement about exactly what is covered, the Congressional backers of the amendment seem to have intended, at the least, protecting the core freedoms listed in the national Bill of Rights. Announced Representative Clarke of Kansas: "I find in the Constitution an article which declared 'the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' For myself, I shall insist that the reconstructed rebels of Mississippi respect the Constitution in their local laws."
The earlier Freedman's Bureau Bill had also been squarely aimed at protecting the right to bear arms. The bill guaranteed federal protection of "the full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings for the security of person and estate, including the constitutional right of bearing arms."
The Amendment was quickly emasculated by the United States Supreme Court in The Slaughter-House Cases and United States v. Cruikshank, The Supreme Court understood the social realities of the South. The Cruikshank decision gave the green light to the Klan, unofficial white militias, and other racist groups to forcibly disarm the freedmen and impose white supremacy.
One state at a time, white racists took control of government by using armed violence and the threat of violence to control balloting on election day. Freedmen and their white allies also resorted to arms. But white Republican governors were usually afraid that employing the black militias fully would set off an even broader race war.
The white South, while defeated on the battlefield in 1865, had continued armed resistance to Northern control for over a decade. When the North, an occupying power, grew weary of the struggle and abandoned its black and Republican allies in the South, the white South was again the master of its destiny.
In deference to the Fourteenth Amendment, some states did cloak their laws in neutral, non-racial terms. For example, the Tennessee legislature barred the sale of any handguns except the "Army and Navy model." The ex-Confederate soldiers already had their high quality "Army and Navy" guns. But cash-poor freedmen could barely afford lower-cost, simpler firearms not of the "Army and Navy" quality. Arkansas enacted a nearly identical law in 1881, and other Southern states followed suit, including Alabama (1893), Texas (1907), and Virginia (1925).
As Jim Crow intensified, other Southern states enacted gun registration and handgun permit laws. Registration came to Mississippi (1906), Georgia (1913), and North Carolina (1917). Handgun permits were passed in North Carolina (1917), Missouri (1919), and Arkansas (1923).
As one Florida judge explained, the licensing laws were "passed for the purpose of disarming the negro laborers... [and] never intended to be applied to the white population."
That gun control has a very unsavory past does not, in itself, prove that all modern gun control proposals are a bad idea. But it does offer reasons to be especially cautious about the dangers of disarming people who cannot necessarily count on their local government to protect them.
Dave Kopel is Research Director of the Independence Institute. This article is based on his book The Samurai, the Mountie, and the Cowboy: Should America Adopt the Gun Controls of Other Democracies? The book contains citations to numerous secondary sources discussing the issues in this article. "
freedomisahapislave
Logged
seshatasefekht7
AfricaSpeaks Member
Posts: 278
RastafariSpeaks
Re: room 101
«
Reply #81 on:
May 05, 2006, 09:26:06 AM »
american slavery and the underground railroad
http://www.africaspeaks.com/reasoning/index.php?topic=2736.0
Logged
seshatasefekht7
AfricaSpeaks Member
Posts: 278
RastafariSpeaks
Re: room 101
«
Reply #82 on:
May 06, 2006, 01:05:22 PM »
I would like to propose the following change to the word Maximum-Emergency Compensatory Action.
The change would be the insertion of the following word:
Maximum-Emergency Compensatory Clandestine Action
Reason/Explanation:
The procedure for executing MECCA is something that is to be kept secret threw completion.
It should be known and understood that the procedures detailing the execution of MECCA is NEVER to be discussed with anything other than The Creator. When discussing the execution of MECCA with The Creator, it is to be done in SILENCE and without any movement(s) that may cause others to know of that said discussion.
I suspect that is a technique of the MECA strategy. There are many techniques such as:
(1) When speaking about Maximum-Emergency Compensatory Action only speak about what it is or what it isn't.
(2) Don't do bodily harm to any white person unless it is in self-defense and/or you are carrying out Maximum-Emergency Compensatory Action.
(3) Don't do bodily harm to any non-white person unless it is in self-defense.
(4) Don't use any white person as a "hostage" in the process of carrying out Maximum-Emergency Compensatory Action.
(5) Don't enact Maximum-Emergency Compensatory Action unless you do so in a bold and open manner that will make as clear as possible that it was you who acted, and that you acted alone.
(6) Don't enact Maximum-Emergency Compensatory Action unless you know that you should do so...not because someone else did so, and not because someone else did, or did not, suggest that you do so.
(7) Don't enact Maximum-Emergency Compensatory Action if you, at any time, begin to lose the desire, or the will, to do so.
(
Don't talk to anyone...repeat...anyone, about any act of Maximum-Emergency Compensatory Action that you intend to commit, or that you think you may intend to commit.
(9) Don't enact Maximum-Emergency Compensatory Action unless at least two people will cease to exist, one being the victim of racism (white supremacy) carrying out MECA, and the other being a white person that is suspected of being a racist (white supremacy) by the victim of racism (white supremacy) carrying out the MECA.
(10) Don't enact Maximum-Emergency Compensatory Action unless you fully realize that it will be the last act of your existence in the known universe, as well as the end of the existence for one or more other persons suspected of practicing racism (white supremacy).
(11) Don't ask another person to assist you in enacting Maximum-Emergency Compensatory Action, do everything yourself.
(12) Don't tell anyone of any plan or intention that you have to enact Maximum-emergency Compensatory Action.
(13) Don't carry written materials on your person while enacting Maximum-Emergency Compensatory Action except those Counter-Racist materials and/or writings which are of practical value in helping to inspire will power, and/or in helping to improve the efficiency of the enactment.
(14) Don't enact Maximum-Emergency Compensatory Action under any circumstances wherein it is known that white persons whom you know are not racists (white supremacists), may be killed, injured, or have their possessions destroyed or damaged as a direct simultaneous result of your act.
(15) Don't plan, or attempt to enact Maximum-Emergency Compensatory Action if you are not currently existing in subjugation to white supremacy (racism).
(16) Don't enact Maximum-Emergency Compensatory Action during periods of so-called "Race Riots", and/or during periods of so-called "mob" action.
(17) Don't enact Maximum-Compensatory Action unless you are a victim of racist (white supremacist) violence, a victim of the threat of of racist (white supremacist) violence, and/or a victim of non-just conditions directly or indirectly caused by, and/or promoted by racist (white supremacist) violence or the threat of racist (white supremacist) violence.
(18) Don't plan Maximum-Emergency Compensatory Action in haste. Take plenty of time. Check, and check again every detail of the plan. Don't enact Maximum-Emergency Compensatory Action when, for some reason, it cannot be enacted according to this plan. Study the circumstances and make another plan.
(19) Don't enact Maximum-emergency Compensatory Action under any circumstances wherein a non-white person may be killed, injured, or have his or her possessions destroyed or damaged as a direct simultaneous result of your act.
(20) Don't attempt to enact Maximum-emergency Compensatory Action in a "sporting manner". Neither attempt to enact it while overcome with anger or passion to the extent that your ability to think and act efficiently and constructively is hampered.
(21) Don't attempt to enact Maximum-Emergency Compensatory Action without a M.E.C.A.P. that outlines Why it was done, Who was involved, What was done specifically, Where it was done, How it was done, and When it was done. Don't enact Maximum-Emergency Compensatory Action unless your M.E.C.A.P. outlines how long you have been planning the act, "proof" of your current mental condition, "proof" of your current physical condition, what tools were used to carry out the act, some examples of the many times you asked white people to help you to produce justice, your current financial position and your financial position for the previous 5 years, a detailed plan of the act, what you hope to accomplish by the act, what will be the result of the act, etc.
(22) Don't enact Maximum-Emergency Compensatory Action by using tools that you are not sure you can operate with maximum efficiency.
(23) Don't restrict the enactment of Maximum-Emergency Compensatory Action only to those white persons that you "personally dislike". Enact Maximum-Emergency Compensatory Action by executing any and all white persons present who you suspect practice racism (white supremacy), including those whom you "like" or "admire", as well as those whom you "dislike" or do not "admire".
(24) Don't enact Maximum-Emergency Compensatory Action unless you have tried all that you know how and have failed to remove yourself from the direct and/or indirect power of, and dependence on, racists (white supremacists) in all areas of people activity.
(25) Don't enact Maximum-Emergency Compensatory Action in times of great natural disasters.
These are just a few of the techniques that should be used or not used in the enactment of Maximum-Emergency Compensatory Action. You'll have to really study the codebook to find all of them. And to really study the codebook you gotta buy a copy of the codebook. I have a running tally of 214 things to do and things that shouldn't be done. I am in the process of collating and refining the codification of a lot of them into a few processes for ease of use and understanding. M.E.C.A.P. is just one of them that I'm working on. No need to change the acronym for another technique. Just add it to the list.
Logged
seshatasefekht7
AfricaSpeaks Member
Posts: 278
RastafariSpeaks
Re: room 101
«
Reply #83 on:
May 15, 2006, 12:07:28 PM »
Race, and/or Racism =
1. A system of thought, speech, and action, operated by people who classify themselves as “white”, and who use deceit, violence, and/or the threat of violence, to subjugate, use, and/or abuse people classified as “non-white”, under conditions that promote the practice of falsehood, non-justice, and incorrectness, in one or more areas of activity, for the ULTIMATE PURPOSE of maintaining, expanding, and/or refining the practice of White Supremacy Racism.
2. Unjust speech, action, and/or inaction, based on the color, and/or non-color, of persons, and/or factors associated with, the color, and/or non-color, of persons.
3. White Supremacy.
“Black” People =
Generally, any people “classified” by “white’ people, as being “non-white”, and/or, as being “darker” of those people generally regarded as “non-white”. The “non-white” classification generally includes persons classified as “brown”, “red”, “yellow”, etc., and/or any “black shades”, “shades” of “black”, and/or “shades of shades” of “black”.
Black Man, and/or Black Woman =
Any Black and/or non-white male or female person who is NOT subject to White Supremacy (Racism), and who does not, in any manner, directly or indirectly, do or say anything that helps to support White Supremacy in any area of activity, including Economics, Education, Entertainment, Labor, Law, Politics, Religion, Sex and War.
[Explanation]:
No “Black”, and/or “non-white” person can be correctly called a “man” or a “woman”, and at the same time, be subject to White Supremacy (Racism).
The reason is that no “Black” and/or “non-white” person can FUNCTION as a “man”, or as a “women”, and at the same time, submit to, or cooperate wit, White Supremacists (Racists), in any manner, directly or indirectly.
That person, at the time, can only function as a MALE or FEMALE “child”, subject, and/or victim.
Therefore, under White Supremacy, it is correct to refer to each Black, or non-white person, as a MALE or FEMALE, and/or, as a victim --- NOT as a “man”; NOT as a “woman”.
Black Fascism =
1. The subjugation of all white people, by Black people, and/or by “non-white people, for the basic purpose of debasing white people, and glorifying non-white people.
2. A non-existent for of “fascism”.
Black Supremacy =
The subjugation of ALL white people, by Black and/or “non-white” people, for the basic purpose of “pleasing” and/or serving ANY or ALL Black or “non-white” persons, at ALL times, in ALL areas of activity, including Economics, Education, Entertainment, Labor, Law, Politics, Religion, Sex and War.
Black Supremacist =
A “non-white” person who, directly, or indirectly helps to maintain the subjugation of ALL white people, for the basic purpose of “pleasing” and/or serving any, or ALL “non-white” persons, at ALL times, in ALL areas of activity, including Economics, Education, Entertainment, Labor, Law, Politics, Religion, Sex and War.
“Black” Power =
1. Any word or deed, and/or any combination of words or deeds that proves effective against White Supremacy (Racism) when employed by the Victims of White Supremacy [non-white people].
2. The sum total of all thought, speech, and action by Black and/or “non-white’ people that helps to reveal truth, promote justice, and/or promote correctness.
Good White Person =
A person classified as “white” and/or Caucasian, who DOES NOT practice Racism at ANY time, in ANY place, IN ANY area of activity, and, who also uses truth in such manner as to PRODUCE justice and correctness, at ALL times, in ALL places, in ALL areas of activity, throughout the universe.
neely fuller jr.
Logged
seshatasefekht7
AfricaSpeaks Member
Posts: 278
RastafariSpeaks
Re: room 101
«
Reply #84 on:
May 16, 2006, 12:30:25 PM »
Morpheus: I imagine that right now you're feeling a bit like Alice. Tumbling down the rabbit hole?
Neo: You could say that.
Morpheus: I can see it in your eyes. You have the look of a man who accepts what he sees because he's expecting to wake up. Ironically, this is not far from the truth. Do you believe in fate, Neo?
Neo: No.
Morpheus: Why not?
Neo: 'Cause I don't like the idea that I'm not in control of my life.
Morpheus: I know exactly what you mean. Let me tell you why you're here. You're here because you know something. What you know, you can't explain. But you feel it. You felt it your entire life. That there's something wrong with the world. You don't know what it is, but it's there. Like a splinter in your mind -- driving you mad. It is this feeling that has brought you to me. Do you know what I'm talking about?
Neo: The Matrix?
Morpheus: Do you want to know what it is?
(Neo nods his head.)
Morpheus: The Matrix is everywhere, it is all around us. Even now, in this very room. You can see it when you look out your window, or when you turn on your television. You can feel it when you go to work, or when go to church or when you pay your taxes. It is the world that has been pulled over your eyes to blind you from the truth.
Neo: What truth?
Morpheus: That you are a slave, Neo. Like everyone else, you were born into bondage, born inside a prison that you cannot smell, taste, or touch. A prison for your mind. (long pause, sighs) Unfortunately, no one can be told what the Matrix is. You have to see it for yourself. This is your last chance. After this, there is no turning back.
(In his left hand, Morpheus shows a blue pill.)
Morpheus: You take the blue pill and the story ends. You wake in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. (a red pill is shown in his other hand) You take the red pill and you stay in Wonderland and I show you how deep the rabbit-hole goes. (Long pause; Neo begins to reach for the red pill) Remember -- all I am offering is the truth, nothing more.
(Neo takes the red pill and swallows it with a glass of water)
Logged
seshatasefekht7
AfricaSpeaks Member
Posts: 278
RastafariSpeaks
Re: room 101
«
Reply #85 on:
May 16, 2006, 12:34:12 PM »
peace and hotep,
The Constitution of the United States of America
Preamble
We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect UNION, establish JUSTICE, insure domestic TRANQUILITY, provide for the common DEFENSE, promote the general WELFARE, and SECURE the BLESSINGS of LIBERTY to ourselves and our posterity, DO ORDAIN and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
*******
"Study, learn, and understand what an “American” is, and what an “American” is not.
Do not call any person “American” unless he or she practices justice and correctness at all times, in all places, in all areas of activity, including Economics, Education, Entertainment, Labor, Law, Politics, Religion, Sex and War.
Do not call any person “American” who practices White Supremacy (Racism), and/or, who, directly or indirectly, tolerates, cooperates with, and/or submits to, the will or power of any person who practices White Supremacy, and/or who, directly or indirectly helps to establish or maintain the practice of injustice or incorrectness.
Reason (s) / Explanation (s):
An “American” is a person, who DOES NOT, at ANY time, in ANY place, in ANY area of activity, practice, support, or tolerate, White Supremacy (Racism), or any other form of injustice or incorrectness.-----neely fuller jr."
*******
freedomisahapislave
http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.table.html#articlei
Logged
seshatasefekht7
AfricaSpeaks Member
Posts: 278
RastafariSpeaks
Re: room 101
«
Reply #86 on:
May 31, 2006, 10:27:04 PM »
Neely Fuller Jr's
*INTRODUCTORY NOTES AND GENERAL WRITINGS RELATIVE TO RACISM AND THE LAW OF COMPENSATION*
Racism: A Basic Perspective
The matter sometimes referred to as the “race problem”, is the BASIC-INITIAL “unfinished business” among the people of the known universe.
Therefore it is not possible to EFFECTIVELY speak and/or act to eliminate ANY major problem that involves people without FIRST eliminating the problem of racism, in every area of activity, including economics, education, entertainment, labor, law, politics, religion, sex and war.
In order to do this, it is necessary for victims of racism [non-white people], in effective numbers, to know and understand who the racists are, how they function, and for what ULTIMATE purpose.
The victims of racism must also know and understand how the power of the racists (to practice racism) can be nullified and/or eliminated, by victims of racism, speaking and/or acting as INDIVIDUAL PERSONS.
Racism: Some Initial Questions
Why race?
What makes racism so important as a problem?
Are there not other problems among the people of the world that are much greater?
What about the problems of unemployment, housing, food shortages, healthcare, robbery, and laziness?
What about tribalism and sexism?
What about the confusion that exists in the area of religion?
What about capitalism, and communism, and drugs, and alcohol, and ignorance, and pollution, and lying politicians?
Why race?
Is it not narrow-minded to see racism as the major evil? Did not other evils exist long before the practice of racism?
What about the problems of distrust, and greed, and envy, and murder, among NON-white people as well as white?
What about economics? Why not see to it that everyone is adequately fed and housed FIRST?
Why not work to establish a system that guarantees that EVERY person will be comfortable and protected---regardless of color, or non-color?
Why not reach for a greater goal? Why not eliminate the problems of distrust, greed, envy, and murder among ALL people?
Why single out the “race” issue as being more important than any of the other problems that continue to plague the people of the known universe?
Why not eliminate the other major problems, and, by doing so, through that process, dismantle the “need” for people to practice racism?
Why not have the SMARTEST people of goodwill, regardless of color, or sex, or age, come together and solve the REAL problems of the world instead of wasting time with what is really an artificial barrier?
Racism: Some Initial Answers
Two Facts:
(1) The WHITE people of the known universe, are collectively, the smartest, AND the most capable, of ALL people, and,
(2) The WHITE SUPREMACISTS (racists) are the smartest, and the most capable of ALL the white people.
Of all the people of the known universe---both white and non-white---those white people who practice racism (white supremacy) have the GREATEST ABILITY to use truth, and to use it in such manner as to produce justice and correctness, in all place, in all areas of activity, in the shortest period of time.
The white people who practice racism know that they could, if they CHOSE to do so, produce justice and correctness among the people of the known universe. They are smart enough to do this. They also know, however, that in the PROCESS of producing justice and correctness, they would also eliminate white supremacy (racism). Knowing this, they have chosen NOT to produce justice and correctness. They prefer to continue to practice white supremacy, though they fully understand that in order to practice white supremacy they must do so by promoting FALSE HOOD, NON-JUSTICE, and INCORRECTNESS. They apparently believe that the value of white supremacy is at least as “valuable” as the practice of justice and correctness. To them, the promotion of white supremacy HAS PROVEN to be, in many respects, “better” than justice, and “better” than correct-ness.
The white supremacists (racist) have a TOTAL need to be, and to feel, supreme over ALL non-white people, at ALL times. This supremacy is what they value most, though they know that it can only be maintained by promoting falsehood, non-justice, and incorrectness. Through the skilled use of deceit, direct violence, and/or the threat of direct or indirect violence, the masters of racism (white supremacy) have chosen to continue this practice for no apparent basic reason than to be “proud” of themselves for causing others to be fearful of them, and/or to be dependent upon them. Such a relationship is non-just and incorrect. This is not the way that [any] people should relate to each other.
Those white people who practice white supremacy should stop doing so. They should strive to become WISE instead of being satisfied with being “smart”. The knowledge and understanding that they possess is a GIFT. That gift should not be wasted on what is fundamentally an ego-producing enterprise. It is incorrect to squander the gift of knowledge and understanding on the promotion of racism. All knowledge and all understanding should be used to produce a universe in which no people---white or non-white---abuse each other. The basic duty of each and every person in the known universe is to find truth, and to use truth in such manner as to produce justice, and correctness, at ALL times, in ALL place, in ALL areas of activity.
In practice, there is no other way for any person in the known universe to “justify” his or her existence.
Explanation of the Law of Compensation:
Question: What is meant by the term “compensation”?
Compensation is a law.
Compensation is a law of “nature”.
Compensation is a law of existence.
Compensation is a law of mathematics.
Compensation is the ‘LAW of LAWS”.
A person compensates for his or her lack of ability by relying on the ability of other persons or things.
A “people” compensate for their “weakness” by depending on the “strength” of other people, or things.
One who tills the soil is compensated by the fruit of the soil.
A microscope compensates for the limitations of the eye. So does candle light… So does electric light.
Light compensates for dark, and dark compensates for light. Heat compensates for cold, and cold compensates for heat. Sound compensates for silence, and silence compensates for sound. Existence compensates for non-existence, and non-existence compensates for existence. “Death” compensates for “life”, and “life” compensates for “death”.
A flying machine compensates for a person’s physical inability to fly.
WRITING is a compensatory process used to make up for limitations in knowledge and/or memory.
“Religion” is a compensatory SYSTEM.
PRODUCTION of off-spring is a compensatory ACT.
MONEY is a compensatory TOOL.
To eat is to compensate.
To sleep is to compensate.
To walk is to compensate.
To talk is to compensate.
To breathe is to compensate.
To cry is to compensate.
To ride is to compensate.
To work is to compensate.
To play is to compensate.
There is no such thing as “OVER-compensation”.
There is no such thing as “UNDER-compensation”.
There is no such thing as “PARTIAL-compensation”.
There is no such thing as “DEGREES of compensation”.
Compensation either IS [compensation] or it ISN’T [compensation].
The law of compensation is applicable to all that is in the known universe.
Special Note:
It is important to know and understand that the word “compensation” is, at best, a word that can be used to describe a [“compensatory”] condition that does exist, an/or a [“compensatory”] “desire” for a condition that does not exist, and/or has never existed.
The use of the word “compensation”, may or may not, sometimes, promote contradiction and/or confusion.
For that reason, both the word and the “concept” of “compensation”, should, like all other words and “concepts”, be used to reveal truth, AND produce JUSTICE and CORRECTNESS.
Explanation of Racism as Related to the Law of Compensation:
Question: How does the law of compensation relate to Racism?
Within the vastness of a phenomenon commonly know as “space”, there exists a phenomenon commonly known as the “universe”.
Within the “Universe” there exists numerous bodies of massed materials of various sizes and shapes which are situated a various “distances” in their relationship to each other. Upon, and/or within some of these massed materials exist things which have been commonly referred to as “plant life” and “animal life”.
Some of this “animal life” is commonly referred to as “human beings”, and/or “people”.
NONE of these “people” are EXACTLY ALIKE in the way that they ARE.
NONE of these “people” are EXACTLY ALIKE in the way that they THINK.
NONE of these people are EXACTLY ALIKE in the way that the APPEAR to other people. Because none of these people are exactly alike in the way that they are, none are exactly alike in the way that they think, and none are exactly alike in the way that they appear to other people, some of the people, sometimes “treat” some of the other people in a “different” way. The difference in treatment between people is always a result based on a difference in thinking that exists among people. The differences in the thinking of some people sometimes causes differences in the treatment of other people, based on the difference in the thoughts of people as regards the “size”, “shape”, “height”, “weight”, “color”, “complexion”, “general presentation”, “general state of being”, of people and/or PARTS of people or persons. Ofttimes some people are treated in an unjust manner, by other people, on the basis of “color’, and/or, on the basis of factors which some people regard as being “associated” with “color”, and/or an “idea” of color.
When people are treated “unjustly”, they are deprived of, and/or denied access to, something of “value” to which they are entitled.
When people are deprived of, and/or denied access to something of value to which they are entitled, it is correct for them to ASK FOR THAT TO WHICH THEY ARE ENTITLED.
When people ASK for that to which they are entitled, and are REFUSED, they are then entitled to compensation.
When people ask for compensation from OTHERS, and are refused that compensation, they must then acquire compensation for THEMSELVES through their own efforts.
When people seek to acquire compensation for themselves through their own efforts they must establish a “COMPENSATORY SYSTEM” to use as a basic guide for thought, speech and/or action.
When people form, and function through, a “Compensator System” they should base that system on some form of compensator “Code” which is especially designed to help serve the “needs” of people according to their “Status” and/or “Classification”.
Most people of the known universe “classify” themselves as being INDIVIDUAL PERSONS.
Most people of the known universe “classify” themselves, and/or ARE classified by OTHER people, as being members of a “Group”, and/or as members of a combination of interrelated and/or associated “Groups”, on a basis of “Language”, Customs”, “Religion and/or Philosophy”, “Economics”, “Color”, etc.
Some people of the known universe HAVE CLASSIFIED THEMSELVES on the basis of the “Non-Color” (“White”). These people call themselves “White People” and/or “Caucasian”.
Some people of the known universe HAVE BEEN CLASSIFIED on the basis of the “Color(s)” (Non-White). These people are generally referred to as being “Black”, “Brown”, “Red”, and “Yellow” and/or collectively, as being “Non-White People”.
Other people of the known universe may, or may not be, or may, or may not, HAVE BEEN classified by other labels.
Those people of the known universe who have classified themselves as “White” people and/or “Caucasian”, and/or as members of the White Race, and who are in NEED of compensation, are, should be, or have been, provided with compensatory “Codes” which are designed to serve the “Needs” of “White” and/or “Caucasian” people. Those people of the known universe who have been classified as “non-white” people, and who are in need of compensation, are, should be, or have been, provided with compensatory “Codes” which are designed to serve the “needs” of “non-white” people.
Any “other” people of the known universe who may be classified by other labels, and are in need of compensation, should be provided with compensatory “codes” which are designed to serve the “needs” of those “other” people who are classified according to those “other” labels.
The “needs” of ALL people are best served when their thought, speech, and action is promoted through the adoption of correct [compensatory] “codes”.
No “code”, however, should be used to promote falsehood, non-justice, or incorrectness. All “codes” should help to produce justice and correctness.
Some Questions and Answers Relative to “Racial” Compensation:
What is the “statute of limitation” on justice?
There is no “statute of limitations” on justice. No matter when, or where, NON-justice exists, it should be immediately replaced with justice.
How does the law of compensation relate to “color”?
All color, “shades” of color, or absence of color, is “neutral”.
There is no such thing as a so-called “right” color or “wrong” color.
All known color, “shades” of color, or absence of color, have a correct claim to existence.
It is INCORRECT to either “hate” or “love” color, “shades” of color, or absence of color.
The action toward, and/or re-action to, color, “shades” of color, or absence of color, by people, is always determined by the way people “see” themselves in relation to all people, place, things, etc.
To RECOGNIZE and/or ACKNOWLEDGE the differences in “color”, “shades” of color, or absence of color, in the appearance, and/or in the essence of people, animals, plants, etc., is CORRECT.
To treat people, animals, plants, etc., UNJUSTLY, and/or INCORRECTLY, by utilizing factors “associated with” differences of color, shades of color, or absence of color, is to contribute to one of the major reasons for the absence of “peace” in the known universe.
General Notes Relative to Racism and the Law of Compensation
If a SYSTEM produces injustice, then the RULES that maintain the system are INCORRECT, even though these SAME rules, if used to maintain a JUST system, would be correct rules.
White Supremacy (Racism) is an incorrect system that promotes injustice. Any person who willfully helps to establish, maintain, expand , and/or refine a condition of White Supremacy, and/or, who does, does not, at all times, strive to speak and/or act against this condition, is a CRIMINAL, and/or and AGENT of criminals.
All “comforts” that come to any whit person as a direct or indirect result of the practice of White Supremacy (Racism) are “comforts” UNJUSTLY RECEIVED.
cont.
Logged
seshatasefekht7
AfricaSpeaks Member
Posts: 278
RastafariSpeaks
Re: room 101
«
Reply #87 on:
May 31, 2006, 10:30:34 PM »
All persons who directly or indirectly practice White Supremacy are EQUAL TO EACH OTHER in that practice. This is true because each individual act of Racism is interrelated with all other acts of Racism. This means that all white persons who practice Racism in ANY form, are equally as guilty as those white persons who practice Racism in ALL FORMS. Racist Man and Racist Woman, by functioning as the White Nation (White Supremacists, collectively) and by acting to maintain, expand, and/or refine the existence of Racism, have, more than any other creature in the known universe, “violated” the “natural” Law of Compensation. By doing so, they have deliberately forced and/or directed all other creatures---particularly non-white people---to do the same.
Facts About the United-Independent Compensatory Code/System/Concept
The term “United-Independent Compensatory Code/System/Concept” refers to the BASIC means THROUGH which the people of the known universe, as INDIVIDUAL PERSONS, think, speak, and/or act, in order to compensate for those things which they, as INDIVIDUAL PERSONS, judge to be MISSING, that they have judged to be of value.
• The word “United”, as used here, means that the Victims of Racism who choose to be “United” in regards to their THOUGHTS as to the NEED to resist, and/or eliminate Racism (White Supremacy).
• The word “Independent”, as used here, means that each and every INDIVIDUAL Victim of Racism is, at all times, in all places, in all areas of activity, “Independent” in regards to his or her CHOICE OF METHODS used to resist and/or eliminate Racism (White Supremacy). This means that NO PERSON, white or non-white, has the just and CORRECT “Authority” to FORCE, and/or COMMAND, any Victim of Racism, to adopt ANY means of peaking and/or acting against Racism (White Supremacy) other than the means that the INDIVIDUAL Victim chooses for him, or her SELF.
• The word “Compensatory”, as used here, means to “make-up” for that which is MISSING---namely, the revelation of truth, and the use of truth, in such manner as to promote justice and correctness.
Justice and correctness is missing among the people of the known universe because the people of the known universe are dominated by, and/or tolerant of, the Racist (White Supremacist). It is the Racists who, in order to maintain the practice of Racism (White Supremacy), have produced the greatest and most effective system of promoting falsehood, non-justice, and incorrectness in the known universe.
• The word “Code”, as used here, means that each individual Victim of Racism speaks and/or acts to help ELIMINATE RACISM by utilizing selections from a ‘list’ of SUGGESTIONS, or from a “combined” list of suggestions designed to help an individual Victim of Racism accomplish that purpose.
• The word “System”, as used here, means that each individual Victim of Racism speaks and/or acts to help eliminate Racism (White Supremacy) as an INDIVIDUAL PERSON according to that part of a ‘pattern’ of certain forms of Speech and/or action “suggested” in a kind of “listing”
Code:
from which any or all victims of Racism can pick and choose as they see fit.
When many Victims of Racism (Victims of White Supremacy) pick and choose to speak and/or act against Racism from the same general “pattern” and/or “Code”, at a time and place of their choice as individuals, a “system” of speech and action becomes “self-developing”.
• The word “Concept”, as used here, means that the entire “United-Independent Compensatory Code / System” is no more than a “Concept”, or idea, during ANY period when no person in the known universe is speaking and/or acting to use TRUTH in a manner that helps to produce JUSTICE and CORRECTNESS.
In sum, the overall term “United-Independent Compensatory Code/System/Concept” means:
Any number of individual persons, who are Victims of Racism (Victims of White Supremacy), who are in the PROCESS of thinking, speaking, and/or acting EFFECTIVELY against Racism (White Supremacy, according to what they, as INDIVIDUAL PERSONS, pick and choose from a general “Code”, “outline”, and/or “suggestion list”, for thought, speech, and/or action, that is especially designed for the purpose of helping and INDIVIDUAL PERSON to think, speak, and/or act against Racism. The “Code”, “outline”, and/or “suggestion list” must be designed, and used, for the purpose of not only eliminating Racism, but to do so through the process of using TRUTH in such manner as to simultaneously PROMOTE JUSTICE and/or CORRECTNESS.
All speech, and/or action, must be at a time, and place, and in the areas of activity, of the individual victims OWN CHOICE.
Some Other Titles for the United-Independent Compensatory Code/System/Concept Are As Follows:
• The Code.
• The Compensatory Code.
• The Compensatory Code/System/Concept.
• The Compensatory Counter-Racist Code.
• The Compensatory Counter-Racist System.
• The Compensatory System.
• United-Independent Compensatory Code.
Any person, WHILE speaking and/or acting in effective opposition to Racism (White Supremacy) is a “producer”, a “promoter”, and/or a “supporter” of the United –Independent Compensatory Code/System/Concept. Also, any person WHILE speaking and/or acting in a manner that helps to promote justice or correctness, is a “producer”, a “promoter”, and/or a “supporter” of the United-Independent Compensatory Code/System/Concept
United-Independent Compensatory Code/System/Concept “Work” In The Following Manner:
• IDEAS for speaking and/or acting to eliminate Racism and producing justice and correctness are “listed” as they come to mind.
• The “list” of ideas is arranged into an order, or “code”, of thought, speech and/or action that is designed to be used by an INDIVIDUAL PERSON.
• The INDIVIDUAL PERSON uses “parts” of the “code” that he or she judges to be “best-suited” for promoting justice and correctness, and eliminating Racism. The INDIVIDUAL PERSON does this by his or her OWN WILL, at a time and place of his or her OWN choosing, in any ONE or MORE “listed” areas of activity, namely: economics, education, entertainment, labor, law, politics, religion, sex and war.
• The INDIVIDUAL PERSON may, or may not, add “refinement” to the “code” by making his or her own additions or modifications to it.
The basic “guides” used by supporters of the United-Independent Compensatory Code/System/Concept are: any and all sources of knowledge and understanding of truth, justice, and correctness. These sources include printed material, verbal messages, personal experiences etc.
There is no one person who is “the leader” of the United-Independent Compensatory Code/System/Concept. Each individual person “leads” him of her SELF, each minute, of each day and night, according to what he or she has chosen from one or more parts of the Code/ System/ Concept, that he or she judges t be of value.
There is no “organization” associated with the United-Independent Compensatory Code/System/Concept that a person can “join”, and/or become a “member” of. A person who says or does anything that helps to promote justice or correctness, and/or, who says or does anything that helps to eliminate Racism (White Supremacy) is, DURING THAT TIME, and “organ” of the Code/System/Concept. During all other times, that person is not such an “organ” (Supporter).
There is no “formal” meeting place and/or “headquarters” associated with the United-Independent Compensatory Code/System/Concept except the brain and/or mind of each individual person while he or she is saying or doing something that helps to promote the objectives of the Code/System/Concept.
There are no mandatory “collections”, “donations”, “loans”, and/or “transfers” of money associated with the United-Independent Compensatory Code/System/Concept.
To “contribute” to the United-Independent Compensatory Code/System/Concept, all a person has to do, is say, or do, something in a manner that helps to eliminates Racism (White Supremacy), and/or, that helps to promote, the practice of justice and correctness.
A supporter of the United-Independent Compensatory Code/System/Concept seeks to speak and/or act to eliminate Racism (White Supremacy) each and every day, and each and every night, in at least ONE area of activity. Examples: economics, education, entertainment, labor, law, politics, religion, sex and war.
A supporter of the United-Independent Compensatory Code/System/Concept AVOIDS speaking, and/or acting, against any people, or persons who are NOT practicing White Supremacy (Racism), as long as White Supremacy is the dominant motivating force among the people of the known universe.
There are no restrictions applicable to ANY persons who seek to help promote the objectives of the United-Independent Compensatory Code/System/Concept in regards to the AGES of those persons.
There is no person who speaks “for another” in association with the United-Independent Compensatory Code/System/Concept. EACH PERSON speaks his or her views and is not responsible for the remarks of others.
No NON-WHITE person is “responsible” for anything that ANY person says or does in “association” with United-Independent Compensatory Code/System/Concept.
It is just and correct for ANY person, white, or non-white, to speak and/or act in support of the United-Independent Compensatory Code/System/Concept.
The BASIC “author” of the United-Independent Compensatory Code/System/Concept is the Law of Compensation itself.
It is the EXISTENCE of White Supremacy (Racism), and other forms of non-justice and incorrectness that “authors” and/or “authorizes” the existence of the United-Independent Compensatory Code/System/Concept.
White Supremacy breeds opposition to White Supremacy.
Non-justice breeds opposition to non-justice.
Incorrectness breeds opposition to incorrectness.
This is the Law of Compensation.
One of the basic goals of every supporter of the United-Independent Compensatory Code/System/Concept, is, and must be, to evolve a universal “Way of Life” in which
(1) No person, will put to death, another person, for ANY reason, and,
(2) Every person will seek to help every other person for no other reason than, that help is needed in order to MAINTAIN justice and correctness.
Logged
seshatasefekht7
AfricaSpeaks Member
Posts: 278
RastafariSpeaks
Re: room 101
«
Reply #88 on:
May 31, 2006, 10:37:38 PM »
Question: Is not Maximum-Emergency Compensatory Justice an INSANE means of conducting Counter-War against Racist war-makers?
Answer: All killing of people, by people, is the result of insane teachings and conditions.
But under current conditions [White Supremacy], Maximum-Emergency Compensatory Justice is a DESPARATE and FINAL way that an individual Victim of Racism can oppose war, and some of the war-makers, when other means have NOT proven EFFECTIVE at the time MOST NEEDED.
Maximum-Emergency Compensatory Justice is the most “honest” method of using COUNTER-violence to express very QUICKLY and EFFECTIVELY, the concept that the use of violence by one person against another for UNJUST reasons, or objectives, MUST result in “waste” for BOTH rather than “profit” for either.
Maximum-Emergency Compensatory Justice is one of the most explicit-FUNCTIONAL “statements” AGAINST war and injustice.
Logged
seshatasefekht7
AfricaSpeaks Member
Posts: 278
RastafariSpeaks
Re: room 101
«
Reply #89 on:
May 31, 2006, 10:39:29 PM »
Question: Would a WHITE person who is opposed to White Supremacy be justified in enacting Maximum-Emergency Compensatory Justice?
Answer: No person WHO IS NOT a Victim of White Supremacy Racism is justified in attempting to enact Maximum-Emergency Compensatory Justice. Under conditions dominated by White Supremacy, it is not possible for ANY WHITE PERSON to enact Maximum-Emergency Compensatory Justice.
No person classified as “white”, and who considers him or her self as being “white” and/or “Caucasian”, is, at the same time, a Victim of White Supremacy--- if he or she FUNCTIONS as a “white” person.
Since Maximum-Emergency Compensatory Justice is to be enacted by a Victim of White Supremacy (non-white person), against White Supremacists, it is NOT POSSIBLE for a WHITE person to enact Maximum-Emergency Compensatory Justice. No “white” person is a Victim of White Supremacy.
Not even a NON-white person is justified in enacting Maximum-Emergency Compensatory Justice unless he or she, as an individual person, has suffered in subjugation to the White Supremacists to the extent that he or she judges such suffering to be completely intolerable and too prolonged.
Logged
Pages:
1
...
4
5
[
6
]
7
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
GENERAL
-----------------------------
=> Announcements
=> GENERAL FORUM
=> Young Adults
=> Special Reasonings Archive
-----------------------------
WORLD HOT SPOTS
-----------------------------
=> Around the World
=> Media Watch
-----------------------------
AFRICA AND THE DIASPORA
-----------------------------
=> Our Beautiful People
-----------------------------
GENERAL
-----------------------------
=> Essays and Reasonings
-----------------------------
AFRICA AND THE DIASPORA
-----------------------------
=> Human Beginnings
-----------------------------
ENTERTAINMENT/ ARTS/ LITERATURE
-----------------------------
=> Poetry
=> Quotes
=> Books & Reviews
=> Arts & Music
-----------------------------
GENERAL
-----------------------------
=> Rastafari
-----------------------------
SCIENCE, SOCIOLOGY, RELIGION
-----------------------------
=> Science and Technology
=> Health and Livity
=> Relationships and Gender Issues
=> Spirituality
=> Mainstream Religion
-----------------------------
HELP
-----------------------------
=> Post Here for Help
-----------------------------
GENERAL
-----------------------------
=> Documentaries
-----------------------------
AFRICA AND THE DIASPORA
-----------------------------
=> Libya
=> Zimbabwe
=> General African News
=> Haiti
=> South Africa
-----------------------------
GENERAL
-----------------------------
=> Reparations
-----------------------------
AFRICA AND THE DIASPORA
-----------------------------
=> Uganda
-----------------------------
GENERAL
-----------------------------
=> Slavery
-----------------------------
INDIA AND THE DIASPORA
-----------------------------
=> Indian Perspectives
-----------------------------
AFRICA AND THE DIASPORA
-----------------------------
=> Rwanda
=> Nigeria
-----------------------------
WORLD HOT SPOTS
-----------------------------
=> Israeli–Palestinian Conflict
-----------------------------
AFRICA AND THE DIASPORA
-----------------------------
=> Ethiopia